| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
05-70368
|
Arteaga v. Mukasey
Fear of persecution for gang membership in Petitioner's native country, does not qualify him for withholding of removal as member of 'social group.' |
Immigration |
|
Dec. 28, 2007 | |
|
06-55681
|
Iasu v. Smith
Where petitioner claims American citizenship, REAL ID Act deprives district court of jurisdiction over his challenge to removal order. |
Immigration |
|
Dec. 19, 2007 | |
|
04-74010
|
Toufighi v. Mukasey
BIA has broad discretion when ruling on motion to reopen, but must show proper consideration of all favorable and unfavorable factors. |
Immigration |
|
Dec. 13, 2007 | |
|
06-70028
|
Rivera v. Mukasey
Asylum request is properly denied where petitioner's testimony showed lack of credibility. |
Immigration |
|
Dec. 9, 2007 | |
|
05-70163
|
Mendoza-Mazariegos v. Mukasey
When immigrant has engaged counsel who fails to appear, judge must take reasonable steps to ensure immigrant's statutory right to counsel is honored. |
Immigration |
|
Dec. 6, 2007 | |
|
06-70396
|
Ramirez v. Mukasey
Inclusion of ‘qualifying crime’ in indictment or complaint is not predicate to alien’s eligibility for temporary ‘U’ nonimmigrant status. |
Immigration |
|
Dec. 4, 2007 | |
|
06-70663
|
Avila-Sanchez v. Mukasey
Alien deported under lawful removal order and illegally returns cannot dispute law when it undergoes change because final judgment withstands judicial change. |
Immigration |
|
Dec. 3, 2007 | |
|
07-35021
|
Gonzales v. Dept. of Homeland Security
Alien who is ineligible to apply for re-admission is not eligible to apply for adjustment of status under IIRIRA. |
Immigration |
|
Dec. 2, 2007 | |
|
05-35715
|
Chaly-Garcia v. U.S.
Guatemalan class member's asylum application satisfies written intent requirement to receive benefits under 'ABC Agreement.' |
Immigration |
|
Nov. 29, 2007 | |
|
04-72386
|
Vatyan v. Mukasey
Immigration judge erroneously requires certification of public document where asylum petitioner may seek to authenticate it through his own testimony. |
Immigration |
|
Nov. 27, 2007 | |
|
05-73883
|
Barragan-Lopez v. Mukasey
Permanent resident's conviction for solicitation to possess at least four pounds of marijuana for sale constitutes crime involving moral turpitude justifying removal. |
Immigration |
|
Nov. 25, 2007 | |
|
05-77020
|
Grigoryan v. Keisler
Filing of boilerplate brief deprives alien of meaningful appellate review, and gives rise to presumption that alien was prejudiced by counsel’s inadequate performance. |
Immigration |
|
Nov. 19, 2007 | |
|
02-56751
|
Sissoko v. Rocha
Court lacks jurisdiction to hear false arrest claim by alien detained, but not removed, under expedited removal provisions who had habeas remedy available. |
Immigration |
|
Nov. 15, 2007 | |
|
04-73960
|
Hanna v. Keisler
Fall of Ba’ath party in Iraq is insufficient to remove alien’s fear of future persecution or foreclose his petition for withholding of removal. |
Immigration |
|
Nov. 5, 2007 | |
|
05-76988
|
Rebilas v. Keisler
Immigrant convicted of attempted public sexual indecency is not removable where conduct falls outside federal definition of attempted sexual abuse of minor. |
Immigration |
|
Nov. 4, 2007 | |
|
04-71026
|
Jordison v. Keisler
Removal order is vacated where record does not preclude possibility that petitioner was convicted of setting fire to his own property. |
Immigration |
|
Oct. 30, 2007 | |
|
06-50438
|
U.S. v. Salazar-Lopez
Failure to allege temporal relationship between alien's removal and prior conviction in indictment is harmless where overwhelming evidence supported enhancement. |
Immigration |
|
Oct. 24, 2007 | |
|
06-30341
|
U.S. v. Perez-Perez
Sentencing court need not explicitly reference each argument in mitigation presented, so long as it sets forth reasoned basis for sentence imposed. |
Immigration |
|
Oct. 22, 2007 | |
|
04-76246
|
Ahmed v. Keisler
Bihari dissident who shows persecution based on political opinion and membership in disfavored group is entitled to asylum and withholding of removal. |
Immigration |
|
Oct. 16, 2007 | |
|
05-74776
|
Martinez-Merino v. Keisler
Petitioner may not attack reinstatement of removal order by attempting to show he had received inadequate notice of his rights during underlying removal proceeding. |
Immigration |
|
Oct. 10, 2007 | |
|
04-73128
|
Quintero-Salazar v. Keisler
Petitioner is erroneously found to be removable where his state conviction is not categorically crime involving moral turpitude under immigration law. |
Immigration |
|
Oct. 9, 2007 | |
|
05-56202
|
Cornejo v. County of San Diego
Vienna Convention Article 36 requires 'state' to contact consular official but creates no judicially enforceable right for foreign national under Section 1983. |
Immigration |
|
Sep. 24, 2007 | |
|
05-73581
|
Melendez v. Gonzales
Alien previously granted pretrial diversion under state rehabilitation scheme cannot receive adjustment of status as 'first time offender' following subsequent drug conviction. |
Immigration |
|
Sep. 19, 2007 | |
|
04-70345
|
Navarro-Lopez v. Gonzales
Petitioner's accessory after fact conviction does not constitutes crime of moral turpitude for purposes of removal. |
Immigration |
|
Sep. 19, 2007 | |
|
04-74313
|
Kawashima v. Gonzales
In removal case, conviction for subscribing to false statement on tax return constitutes aggravated felony. |
Immigration |
|
Sep. 18, 2007 | |
|
04-76644
|
Marmolejo-Campos v. Gonzales
Petitioner's aggravated DUI conviction is crime involving moral turpitude under Immigration Naturalization Act. |
Immigration |
|
Sep. 12, 2007 | |
|
05-70605
|
Ortega-Cervantes v. Gonzales
Alien's conditional release from detention pending final removal decision is not 'parole into United States' making him eligible for adjustment of status. |
Immigration |
|
Sep. 5, 2007 | |
|
04-71026
|
Jordison v. Gonzales
Removal order is vacated where record does not preclude possibility that petitioner was convicted of setting fire to his own property. |
Immigration |
|
Sep. 4, 2007 | |
|
05-74930
|
He v. Gonzales
Birth of children in United States cannot establish changed circumstances sufficient to satisfy exception to bars applicable to motions to reopen immigration proceedings. |
Immigration |
|
Sep. 4, 2007 | |
|
05-77103
|
Sandoval-Lua v. Gonzales
Petitioner meets his burden to show he has not been convicted of aggravated felony and is eligible for cancellation of removal. |
Immigration |
|
Aug. 29, 2007 |
