For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court

Name Category Published
U.S. v. Bastide-Hernandez
Failure of a notice to appear to include time and date information does not deprive the immigration court of subject matter jurisdiction. 		Immigration 9th Jul. 12, 2022
Barseghyan v. Garland
Petition for review was granted because three out of the four evidentiary inconsistencies relied upon by the Board of Immigration Appeals were not actually inconsistent. 		Immigration 9th Jul. 11, 2022
Vega v. Garland
Alien was not eligible for an adjustment of his immigration status because he illegally reentered the United States and was present when the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act became effective. 		Immigration 9th Jul. 11, 2022
Sarkar v. Garland
Government's motion to administratively close a case because it deemed non-citizen a low enforcement priority was denied because the court's inherent authority to manage its docket would not be served. 		Immigration 9th Jul. 5, 2022
Biden v. Texas
Government's rescission of a program that returned non-Mexican nationals to Mexico pending removal did not violate the Immigration and Nationality Act since the Act granted discretionary authority to return aliens. 		Immigration USSC Jul. 1, 2022
Hernandez v. Garland
Non-citizen was ineligible for cancellation of removal because his grant of temporary protected status did not constitute an admission to the United States for purposes of obtaining lawful permanent resident status. 		Immigration 9th Jun. 29, 2022
Hernandez v. Garland
Petitioners granted special rule cancellation of removal under Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American Relief Act Section 203 are barred from pursuing cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C. Section 1229b(a). 		Immigration 9th Jun. 28, 2022
Velasquez-Samayoa v. Garland
Board of Immigration Appeals erred by failing to assess petitioner's aggregate risk of being tortured where petitioner posited two alternative theories of why he would be tortured if removed. 		Immigration 9th Jun. 27, 2022
Greenwood v. Garland
The Board of Immigration Appeals may rely on a previous adverse credibility determination to deny a motion to reopen a removal order if that earlier finding factually undermines petitioner's new argument. 		Immigration 9th Jun. 17, 2022
Martinez v. Clark
Determining whether a detained noncitizen is a danger to the community is a fact-intensive "discretionary judgment" that cannot be reviewed by a district court. 		Immigration 9th Jun. 16, 2022
Marquez-Reyes v. Garland
The "encouraged" component of the alien smuggling statute is not facially overbroad under the First Amendment. 		Immigration 9th Jun. 15, 2022
Johnson v. Arteaga-Martinez
Under 8 U.S.C. Section 1231(a)(6), the government is not required to offer detained noncitizens bond hearings after six months of detention. 		Immigration USSC Jun. 13, 2022
Garland v. Gonzalez
District courts exceeded jurisdiction in awarding injunctive relief to noncitizens because the Immigration and Nationality Act deprived them of jurisdiction to enjoin the operation of certain provisions of the act. 		Immigration USSC Jun. 13, 2022
Flores Molina v. Garland
Record evidence compelled the conclusion that asylum seeker's past experiences rose to the level of persecution because he was repeatedly forced to flee from his home in the face of death threats. 		Immigration 9th Jun. 13, 2022
Mendoza-Garcia v. Garland
Oregon first-degree burglary of a dwelling is a categorical match to generic burglary. 		Immigration 9th Jun. 10, 2022
Vasquez-Borjas v. Garland
Petitioner was ineligible for cancellation of removal because his California counterfeiting conviction was a categorical match for the federal crime of forgery and therefore was a crime of moral turpitude. 		Immigration 9th Jun. 6, 2022
Olea-Serefina v. Garland
Noncitizen's prior conviction for corporal injury upon a child was a crime-of-violence aggravated felony that made her ineligible for cancellation of removal. 		Immigration 9th May 20, 2022
Fon v. Garland
The harm asylum seeker suffered and evidence of the country's political and societal turmoil compelled a finding of past persecution. 		Immigration 9th May 19, 2022
Patel v. Garland
Federal courts lack jurisdiction to review facts determined by immigration judge as part of discretionary-relief proceedings under 8 U.S.C. Section 1255 and Section 1252(a)(2)(B)(i). 		Immigration USSC May 17, 2022
Udo v. Garland
Plaintiff's petition for review of his Convention Against Torture claim was granted since the agency failed to give reasoned consideration to persuasive evidence of his persecution in Nigeria for homosexuality. 		Immigration 9th May 5, 2022
U.S. v. Hernandez-Garcia
Marine Corps did not violate the Posse Comitatus Act by surveilling defendant north of the California-Mexico border because military assistance to Border Patrol was authorized by the 2016 National Defense Authorization Act. 		Immigration 9th May 5, 2022
Hernandez-Ortiz v. Garland
Petitioner did not show ineffective assistance of counsel to toll the deadline for his motion to reopen his removal proceedings since he retained his attorneys after the deadline had passed. 		Immigration 9th Apr. 27, 2022
Gutierrez-Zavala v. Garland
Although the Board of Immigration Appeals ruled on the merits of a motion to reopen, the petition for review was denied because the Board did not have jurisdiction in the first place. 		Immigration 9th Apr. 27, 2022
Amended Opinion: Tzompantzi-Salazar v. Garland
The possibility that petitioner could relocate and would not likely be subjected to torture was sufficient to deny relief under the Convention Against Torture, regardless of the reasonableness of relocating. 		Immigration 9th Apr. 22, 2022
Martinez-Rodriguez v. Giles
Mexican citizens provided sufficient evidence that dairy farm, which recruited them in Mexico under TN Visa program for professional-level work, actually hired them as nonprofessional, general laborers. 		Immigration 9th Apr. 19, 2022
Valdez Amador v. Garland
Because the modified categorical approach no longer applied, the court remanded to the Board of Immigration Appeals to determine if consensual intercourse obtained through fraud falls under the generic federal offense. 		Immigration 9th Mar. 10, 2022
B.R. v. Garland
Immigration judges have authority to allow the Department of Homeland Security to cure improper service of a Notice to Appear without requiring termination of proceedings. 		Immigration 9th Feb. 24, 2022
Ortiz Narez v. Garland
A non-citizen was removable because voluntary manslaughter under California law is a crime involving moral turpitude. 		Immigration 9th Feb. 17, 2022
Amended Opinion: Tomczyk v. Garland
For purposes of reinstatement of a prior removal order, an individual's inadmissible status renders that individual's reentry illegal regardless of the manner of reentry. 		Immigration 9th Feb. 14, 2022
Ruiz-Colmenarez v. Garland
An immigration judge is not required to grant petitioners the presumption of absolute credibility or the benefit of every doubt. 		Immigration 9th Feb. 10, 2022
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.