Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
97-35500
|
Albertson's Inc. v. United Food and Commercial Workers Union, AFL-CIO & CLC
Employees may sue under Fair Labor Standards Act even if collective bargaining agreement calls for arbitration. |
Labor Law |
|
Mar. 12, 1999 | |
97-36088
|
McGuire v. City of Portland
Firefighters are exempt employees absent actual, significant likelihood of penalties inconsistent with salaried status. |
Labor Law |
|
Mar. 11, 1999 | |
97-1056
|
Marquez v. Screen Actors Guild Inc.
Union doesn't breach duty of fair representation by negotiating union security clause. |
Labor Law |
|
Mar. 11, 1999 | |
96-55991
|
Tristar Pictures Inc. v. Directors Guild of America Inc.
Existence of 'pseudonym' remedy for director unhappy with edits doesn't bar arbitrator from granting other relief. |
Labor Law |
|
Mar. 11, 1999 | |
D025958
|
Rosas v. Dishong
OSHA safety requirements don't apply to residential landscape maintenance employee injured while trimming tree. |
Labor Law |
|
Mar. 11, 1999 | |
97-1184
|
National Federation of Federal Employees, Local 1309 v. Dept. of the Interior
Under federal labor statute, Federal Labor Relations Authority has power to determine if duty to bargain includes midterm bargaining. |
Labor Law |
|
Mar. 11, 1999 | |
98-6007
|
Garvin v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.
Divestiture of corporate doesn't obligate payment of termination allowances pursuant to collective bargaining agreement. |
Labor Law |
|
Mar. 9, 1999 | |
97-889
|
Wright v. Universal Maritime Service Corp.
No requirement to use collective bargaining agreement's arbitration procedure in Americans with Disabilities Act claim. |
Labor Law |
|
Mar. 8, 1999 | |
E021207
|
San Bernardino Public Employees Association v. City of Fontana
Annual leave and longevity pay benefits are conditions of employment subject to collective bargaining process. |
Labor Law |
|
Mar. 2, 1999 | |
97-70664 & 97-71105
|
Herman v. Tidewater Pacific Inc.
Secretary of Labor's jurisdiction over uninspected seagoing vessels isn't preempted by Coast Guard regulation. |
Labor Law |
|
Mar. 2, 1999 | |
C023763
|
Haywood v. American River Fire Protection District
Disability benefits denied to employee that refuses to work due to risk of future depression from workplace disciplinary actions. |
Labor Law |
|
Mar. 2, 1999 | |
B110631
|
Kelly v. Vons Companies Inc.
Employees' suit is collaterally estopped when labor arbitrator already ruled on same issues in recent union dispute. |
Labor Law |
|
Mar. 2, 1999 | |
97-56164
|
Williamson v. UNUM Life Insurance
Appellate jurisdiction is lacking where disability claim is remanded to healthplan administrator for decision on merits. |
Labor Law |
|
Mar. 2, 1999 | |
A079920
|
Kreeft v. City of Oakland
Fair Labor Standards Act premium pay is attached to individuals and not rank. |
Labor Law |
|
Mar. 1, 1999 | |
C027092
|
Mamika v. Barca
Penalties for not paying employee who quit within 72 hours are calculated on a daily basis, not workday basis. |
Labor Law |
|
Mar. 1, 1999 | |
97-16778 and 97-16779
|
Willis v. Pacific Maritime Association
Americans with Disability Act doesn't require employer to violate bargaining agreement to accommodate worker. |
Labor Law |
|
Mar. 1, 1999 | |
97-55351
|
Grant v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.
Psychologist's contention that undefined mental condition prevented pursuit of claim doesn't justify equitable tolling. |
Labor Law |
|
Feb. 26, 1999 | |
97-0591
|
Lloyd v. AMF Bowling Centers Inc.
Termination of an employee for failing to show-up for work doesn't violate public policy. |
Labor Law |
|
Feb. 24, 1999 | |
C027092
|
Mamika v. Barca
Penalties for not paying employee who quit within 72 hours are calculated on a daily basis, not workday basis. |
Labor Law |
|
Feb. 23, 1999 | |
99-0204
|
Earthgrains Baking Companies Inc. v. Teamsters Union Local No. 78
Federal court lacks jurisdiction to enjoin union from striking where disagreement is over interpretation of agreement which specifically excludes arbitration. |
Labor Law |
|
Feb. 22, 1999 | |
98-1071
|
Theede v. United States Department of Labor
Order |
Labor Law |
|
Feb. 17, 1999 | |
97-1446
|
Hagadorn v. M.F. Smith & Associates Inc.
Order |
Labor Law |
|
Feb. 16, 1999 | |
97-9577
|
Four B Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
Employer's selective prohibition of union activity on employer's premises violates the National Labor Relations Act. |
Labor Law |
|
Jan. 28, 1999 | |
97-2288
|
Braziel v. Tobosa Developmental Services
Implied agreement exempting sleep time from paid work valid under Fair Labor Standards Act if known when hired. |
Labor Law |
|
Jan. 21, 1999 | |
97-8116
|
U.S. v. Henry
Failure to report "all" income constitutes false, material statements in violation of the substitutive elements of 18 U.S.C. Section 1920. |
Labor Law |
|
Jan. 12, 1999 | |
96-3412, 97-3004 and 97-3238
|
McCue v. Kansas
Despite possible errors in admission of evidence, there's no abuse of discretion if error's harmless. |
Labor Law |
|
Jan. 8, 1999 | |
97-1469
|
Robertson v. Morgan County
Order |
Labor Law |
|
Jan. 7, 1999 | |
97-1130
|
Shankle v. B-G Maintenance Management of Colorado Inc.
Mandatory arbitration agreement requiring employee pay half of arbitration fees is unenforceable under Federal Arbitration Act. |
Labor Law |
|
Jan. 6, 1999 | |
97-3037
|
Medlock v. Ortho Biotech Inc.
Sufficient evidence exist to support finding of retaliatory discharge of employee for filing and pursuing discrimination suit. |
Labor Law |
|
Jan. 6, 1999 | |
97-9535 and 97-9550
|
Aramark Corp. v. NLRB
Food service contractor may lack control of labor relations and be exempt from collective bargaining. |
Labor Law |
|
Sep. 23, 1998 |