For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices or call 949-702-5390.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Sign up for Daily Journal emails
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court
Name Category Published
Modification: Save Lafayette v. City of Lafayette
Multi-family housing development project application that was deemed completed in 2011 could be resumed and approved years later, despite the area being currently zoned for only single-family homes. 		Municipal Law 1DCA/3 Dec. 19, 2022
Save Lafayette v. City of Lafayette
Multi-family housing development project application that was deemed completed in 2011 could be resumed and approved years later, despite the area being currently zoned for only single-family homes. 		Municipal Law 1DCA/3 Dec. 2, 2022
Tracy Rural County Fire v. Local Agency Formation
County local agency formation commissions do not have statutory authority to initiate resolutions effectuating organizational changes including territory annexations or detachments to the city. 		Municipal Law 3DCA Oct. 14, 2022
Today's IV, Inc. v. L.A. County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
Hotel owner had no cause of action for inverse condemnation against city's construction of an underground subway line as the impairment to the hotel's access was temporary, due to actual construction work, and not unreasonable. 		Municipal Law 2DCA/8 Oct. 7, 2022
Kirk v. City of Morgan Hill
Penal Code Section 25250, requiring theft or loss of gun to be reported within 5 days did not preempt local ordinance that required reporting within 48 hours. 		Municipal Law 6DCA Oct. 4, 2022
CV Amalgamated LLC v. City of Chula Vista
City failed to follow its ministerial duty to follow its own procedures set forth in cannabis ordinance when it rejected storefront license applications in phase one of the application process for failure to score high enough. 		Municipal Law 4DCA/1 Aug. 17, 2022
Plata v. City of San Jose
Municipal water customers' claim against the water company regarding the legality of its tiered rate structure required proper, satisfactory presentation of those claims as detailed under the Government Claims Act. 		Municipal Law 4DCA/3 Feb. 4, 2022
Tran v. County of Los Angeles
Statutory thirty-day limit imposed on Los Angeles Board of Supervisor's review was a mandatory limit rendering the Board's failure to take timely action an affirmation of the reviewed decision. 		Municipal Law 2DCA/2 Jan. 24, 2022
Modification: Citizens for South Bay Coastal Access v. City of San Diego
After Commission certifies local government's land use plan, it delegates authority over coastal development permits to local government; thus, state law did not preempt city's municipal code. 		Municipal Law 4DCA/1 Mar. 17, 2020
Citizens for South Bay Coastal Access v. City of San Diego
After Commission certifies local government's land use plan, it delegates authority over coastal development permits to local government; thus, state law did not preempt city's municipal code. 		Municipal Law 4DCA/1 Feb. 20, 2020
Lateef v. City of Madera
Madera Municipal Code Section 10-3.1310(E) does not emphasize those voting, but rather the number of votes required to overturn the denial of an application for a use permit. 		Municipal Law 5DCA Feb. 19, 2020
City and County of San Francisco v. The Regents of the University of California
Charter cities may require state agencies to assist in collection and remittance of municipal taxes; thus, City's tax collection requirement was valid exercise of its power from which universities were not immune. 		Municipal Law CASC Jun. 21, 2019
Boatworks, LLC v. City of Alameda
Trial court erred in ruling City could not treat certain areas as parks, in order to analyze development impact fees needed to support new development. 		Municipal Law 1DCA/4 May 17, 2019
California Charter Schools Assn. v. City of Huntington Park
Mere inquiries, requests, and meetings are not sufficient to show current and immediate threat to public health, safety and welfare in order to adopt an urgency ordinance under Government Code Section 65858. 		Municipal Law 2DCA/3 May 17, 2019
Save Lafayette Trees v. City of Lafayette
Municipal Code Section 6-236's 180-day statute of limitations is preempted by Section 65009's 90-day bar, when considering decisions by local agencies made pursuant to the planning and zoning law. 		Municipal Law 1DCA/3 Oct. 25, 2018
Westsiders Opposed v. City of Los Angeles
Charter cannot be construed as restricting municipal power without clear mandate in the charter itself; thus, amendment of the General Plan was not barred by the City Charter. 		Municipal Law 2DCA/8 Oct. 3, 2018
Modification: Citizens Coalition Los Angeles v. City of Los Angeles
CEQA's Section 21166 applies where City created new subzone, and moved a proposed project into that subzone because the prior environmental documents retained relevance in light of the proposed changes. 		Municipal Law 2DCA/2 Sep. 17, 2018
Citizens Coalition Los Angeles v. City of Los Angeles
CEQA's Section 21166 applies where City created new subzone, and moved a proposed project into that subzone because the prior environmental documents retained relevance in light of the proposed changes. 		Municipal Law 2DCA/2 Aug. 27, 2018
Lamar Advertising Co. v. County of Los Angeles
Under state law re-erection of billboard is not 'customary maintenance;' may be interfered with by local authority. 		Municipal Law 2DCA/8 May 10, 2018
J. Arthur Properties, II, LLC v. City of San Jose
City properly deems marijuana collective does not qualify as 'medical office,' under municipal code definition; cannot qualify as legal nonconforming use. 		Municipal Law 6DCA Mar. 20, 2018
Don't Cell Our Parks v. City of San Diego
Denial of petition challenging city’s authorization of construction in public park affirmed where city charter gives city discretion to determine whether project constitutes change requiring vote. 		Municipal Law 4DCA/1 Mar. 19, 2018
Modification: City of Montclair v. Cohen
City or county designated housing successors for former redevelopment agencies that report to, are components of, or are controlled by city or county are not eligible for housing entity cost allowance. 		Municipal Law 3DCA Mar. 2, 2018
Save Lafayette v. City of Lafayette
Judgment denying referendum reversed and remanded where referendum challenging enactment of zoning ordinance does not enact zoning inconsistent with general plan. 		Municipal Law 1DCA/4 Feb. 23, 2018
City of Montclair v. Cohen
City or county designated housing successors for former redevelopment agencies that report to, are components of, or are controlled by city or county are not eligible for housing entity cost allowance. 		Municipal Law 3DCA Feb. 7, 2018
Lippman v. City of Oakland
Judgment reversed where city violates California Building Code by authorizing single hearing officer, instead of appeals board, to hear appeal of citations administered by city building department. 		Municipal Law 1DCA/4 Jan. 24, 2018
Clews Land & Livestock, LLC v. City of San Diego
Plaintiffs challenging city approval of development project fail to exhaust administrative remedies where plaintiffs fail to appeal environmental determination of officer to city council. 		Municipal Law 4DCA/1 Jan. 10, 2018
Modification: Gonzalez v. City of Norwalk
Sustained demurrer affirmed where city ordinance applies existing, approved tax and thereby does not 'impose, extend, or increase taxes' without voter approval. 		Municipal Law 2DCA/3 Jan. 5, 2018
City of Anaheim v. Cohen
Department of finance's use of the 2011 dissolution law to deny city's request for funds unconstitutionally impairs private developer's contractual rights . 		Municipal Law 3DCA Dec. 21, 2017
Gonzalez v. City of Norwalk
Sustained demurrer affirmed where city ordinance applies existing, approved tax and thereby does not 'impose, extend, or increase taxes' without voter approval. 		Municipal Law 2DCA/3 Dec. 6, 2017
Modification: Kennedy Commission et al. v. City of Huntington Beach et al.
Government Code Section 65454, which prohibits a municipality from amending a specific plan unless consistent with the general plan, does not apply to a charter city unless adopted by charter or ordinance. 		Municipal Law 4DCA/2 Nov. 22, 2017
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.