Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
99-3032
|
Walkenbach v. Hawk
Order |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Nov. 7, 1999 | |
96-6124
|
McAlpine v. Thompson
Inmates claim for injunctive relief based on conditions of confinement is mooted by his release on parole. |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Nov. 4, 1999 | |
98-4193
|
Hickey v. Austin
Order |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Nov. 4, 1999 | |
99-3038
|
Turner v. Gibbens
Order |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Nov. 3, 1999 | |
98-2231
|
Giron v. Corrections Corporation of America
Excessive force claim based on rape of inmate by prison guard doesnt require showing of malice. |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Oct. 29, 1999 | |
99-1187
|
Oates v. Englund
Order |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Oct. 28, 1999 | |
99-1051
|
Hayes v. Marriott
Order |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Oct. 28, 1999 | |
98-4190
|
Roberts v. Roe
Order |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Oct. 28, 1999 | |
99-7040
|
Lee v. Hazelwood
Order |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Oct. 27, 1999 | |
B122133
|
Holversten v. Superior Court (Holversten)
When incarcerated prisoner desires to make a court appearance in child custody proceeding, trial court is required to fashion appropriate remedy. |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Oct. 22, 1999 | |
97-16069 and 97-16071
|
Taylor v. United States
After entry of final judgment without reservation of jurisdiction, motion to terminate prior consent decree under Prison Litigation Reform Act is moot. |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Sep. 30, 1999 | |
98-16794
|
Rumbles v. Hill
Prison Litigation Reform Act doesn't deprive federal court of subject-matter jurisdiction for failure to exhaust administrative remedies where only damages are sought. |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Sep. 30, 1999 | |
B122133
|
Hoversten v. Superior Court (Hoversten)
When incarcerated prisoner desires to make a court appearance in child custody proceeding, trial court is required to fashion appropriate remedy. |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Sep. 30, 1999 | |
97-16599
|
Burnsworth v. Gunderson
Without supporting evidence, a disciplinary conviction imposed by prison officials violates inmate's procedural due-process rights. |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Sep. 3, 1999 | |
96-16323
|
Wakefield v. Thompson
Inmate's Eighth Amendment rights may be violated when state correctional officer fails to provide a supply of prescription medication on the prisoner's release from confinement. |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Aug. 6, 1999 | |
95-35860
|
May v. Baldwin
Religious Freedom Restoration Act doesn't bar officials from requiring inmate to loosen hairstyle for search. |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Jul. 29, 1999 | |
95-17317 and 96-15642
|
Hook v. Arizona Dept. of Corrections
State's passage of contrary statute cannot avoid federal court order to pay special masters. |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Jul. 27, 1999 | |
95-17317
|
Hook v. Arizona Dept. of Corrections
State's passage of contrary statute cannot avoid federal court order to pay special masters. |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Jul. 27, 1999 | |
95-17259 and 95-17260
|
Hines v. Gomez
Inmate's reputation as complainer who used grievance system supports finding disciplinary report was retaliation. |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Jul. 26, 1999 | |
95-56725
|
Blueford v. Prunty
Prison employee is qualifiedly immune from inmate's same-sex harassment claim. |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Jul. 25, 1999 | |
93-767
|
Rouser v. White
Religious Freedom Restoration Act is appropriate standard for resolving an inmate's suit against prison officials. |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Jul. 19, 1999 | |
98cv1937
|
Cooper v. Garcia
Classifying prisoner as a sex offender, based only on an arrest for a sex crime, doesn't violate due process. |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Jul. 16, 1999 | |
95-17401
|
Munoz v. Rowland
Prison's nondisciplinary finding of gang association isn't collateral consequence avoiding mootness of paroled inmate's appeal. |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Jul. 15, 1999 | |
96-15135
|
Ashker v. California Dept. of Corrections
State prison official sued individually doesn't have Eleventh Amendment immunity for inmate's state tort claim. |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Jul. 11, 1999 | |
95-15071
|
Ashelman v. Wawrzaszek
Accommodation is necessary in prison menu to provide kosher meals for Jewish inmate. |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Jul. 9, 1999 | |
96-55662
|
Thompson v. Souza
Officials have qualified immunity for visual body cavity searches and urine tests of preselected prisoners. |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Jul. 9, 1999 | |
96-55534
|
Somers v. Thurman
Female guard doesn't violate male inmate's rights by body cavity searches and watching him bathe. |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Jul. 7, 1999 | |
96-55534
|
Somers v. Thurman
Female guard doesn't violate male inmate's rights by body cavity searches and watching him bathe. |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Jul. 6, 1999 | |
96-318
|
Richardson v. McKnight
Guards employed by private firm aren't entitled to qualified immunity regarding allegations from prisoner's injuries. |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Jul. 2, 1999 | |
95-1352
|
Edwards v. Balisok
9th Circuit errs in finding challenges to disciplinary hearing procedures are always cognizable under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Jun. 29, 1999 |