Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
23-2664
|
Bird v. Dzurenda
Prison officials who retaliated against prisoner for complaining about another inmate were shielded by qualified immunity because it was not clearly established that doing so violated the inmate's civil rights. |
Qualified Immunity, Prisoners' Rights |
|
P. Bumatay | Mar. 14, 2025 |
22-55237
|
D'Braunstein v. California Highway Patrol
District court erroneously applied qualified immunity to officer who arrested and delayed medical care to car accident victim who had suffered a stroke, believing him to be on drugs. |
Qualified Immunity |
|
D. Bress | Mar. 13, 2025 |
23-55718
|
Estate of Najera-Aguirre v. City of Riverside
An officer who shot a suspect six times without warning, two times of which were while the suspect's back may have been turned, was not entitled to qualified immunity. |
Qualified Immunity |
|
M. McKeown | Mar. 12, 2025 |
24-349
|
Johnson v. Myers
Officers not entitled to qualified immunity for using deadly force without warning less than six seconds after kicking in door where suspect raised his hand in compliance with officers' commands. |
Qualified Immunity |
|
W. Fletcher | Mar. 4, 2025 |
23-3052
|
K.J. v. Jackson
School officials who failed to give a student the opportunity to explain himself following a new charge in connection with a previous incident were not eligible for qualified immunity. |
Qualified Immunity, Constitutional Law |
|
R. Paez | Feb. 12, 2025 |
23-35365
|
Olson v. County of Grant
Officer's warrantless review of plaintiff's cell phone, which contained nude photos of plaintiff, was a Fourth Amendment violation because he had neither a warrant nor suspicion of criminal activity. |
Constitutional Law, Qualified Immunity |
|
M. McKeown | Feb. 11, 2025 |
23-15356
|
Singh v. City of Phoenix
The use of deadly force by an officer was not objectively reasonable because the plaintiff did not brandish a knife, but rather held it to his own neck. |
Qualified Immunity |
|
S. Graber | Dec. 27, 2024 |
23-15726
|
Napouk v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Dept.
A reasonable officer would find that a suspect who held a stick-shaped object and refused to comply with commands to drop his weapon posed an immediate threat. |
Qualified Immunity |
|
L. VanDyke | Dec. 11, 2024 |
21-15521
|
Spencer v. Pew
An officer's use of force, placing his weight on a handcuffed, previously resisting suspect, was not covered by qualified immunity. |
Qualified Immunity |
|
D. Collins | Sep. 17, 2024 |
23-15487
|
Sanderlin v. Dwyer
District court properly denied qualified immunity, where a reasonable factfinder could conclude that defendant officer violently retaliated against protester for peacefully exercising First Amendment rights. |
Qualified Immunity, Constitutional Law |
|
J. Nguyen | Sep. 5, 2024 |
21-56237
|
Chinaryan v. City of Los Angeles
LAPD officers were not entitled to qualified immunity after conducting a high-risk vehicle stop based on nothing more than a reasonable suspicion that the vehicle was stolen. |
Qualified Immunity, Constitutional Law |
|
J. Nguyen | Aug. 15, 2024 |
23-15480
|
Scott v. Smith
No qualified immunity on Fourth Amendment excessive force claim, where police used bodyweight force on the back of a prone individual suffering from a mental illness and not suspected of a crime. |
Qualified Immunity |
|
R. Desai | Jul. 31, 2024 |
22-16863
|
Rosenbaum v. City of San Jose
Officers not entitled to qualified immunity where their conduct of allowing a police dog to continue biting a suspect under control had been clearly established by precedent as violative. |
Qualified Immunity |
|
G. Sanchez | Jul. 12, 2024 |
23-15953
|
Cuevas v. City of Tulare
Qualified immunity shielded officers from excessive force claim based on them returning fire at a suspect in a vehicle and wounding a passenger who was not suspected of any wrongdoing. |
Qualified Immunity |
|
R. Nelson | Jul. 11, 2024 |
22-16495
|
Calonge v. City of San Jose
An officer was not entitled to qualified immunity for using deadly force where there was conflicting evidence regarding the circumstances preceding the shooting. |
Qualified Immunity |
|
M. Friedland | Jun. 10, 2024 |
23-15271
|
Carley v. Aranas
Prison medical director was entitled to qualified immunity for denying treatment to inmate with Hepatitis C because there was no legal consensus regarding constitutionally sufficient treatment for such patients. |
Qualified Immunity |
|
J. Bybee | Jun. 4, 2024 |
22-17008
|
Hart v. City of Redwood City
Officers' use of deadly force was objectively reasonable where the deceased was not responding to commands and quickly approaching with a raised knife. |
Qualified Immunity |
|
L. VanDyke | Apr. 22, 2024 |
22-15546
|
Perez v. City of Fresno
Paramedic was immune from liability for death of patient caused by requesting an officer sit on patient to help secure him for medical transport because paramedic acted with a medical purpose. |
Qualified Immunity |
|
D. Forrest | Apr. 16, 2024 |
21-55994
|
Estate of Hernandez v. City of Los Angeles
Although reasonable jury could have concluded officer used excessive force, qualified immunity shielded her because no precedent squarely governed shooting wounded suspect a sixth time as he attempted to stand. |
Qualified Immunity |
|
D. Collins | Mar. 22, 2024 |
22-16335
|
Martinez v. High
Officer who disclosed confidential report of abuse to plaintiff's abuser was entitled to qualified immunity because the violation was not yet clearly established. |
Qualified Immunity |
|
R. Desai | Jan. 29, 2024 |
22-15382
|
Waid v. County of Lyon
Defendants were entitled to qualified immunity on plaintiffs' Fourth Amendment excessive force claim where officers shot the unarmed decent as he charged down a short hallway towards them. |
Qualified Immunity |
|
R. Nelson | Nov. 22, 2023 |
20-56254
|
Smith v. Agdeppa
Summary judgment based on qualified immunity was not proper where there was evidence in the record that contradicted the officer's description of events surrounding his use of deadly force. |
Qualified Immunity |
|
M. Christen | Jan. 3, 2023 |
20-56413
|
Peck v. Montoya
Deputies that did not shoot and kill decedent were entitled to qualified immunity on plaintiff's excessive-force claim because they were not integral participants in the constitutional violation. |
Qualified Immunity |
|
E. Miller | Oct. 19, 2022 |
20-55043
|
Simmons v. Arnett
Prison guard was entitled to qualified immunity because prisoner failed to satisfy his burden to show that the Eighth Amendment rights allegedly violated were clearly established. |
Qualified Immunity |
|
C. Callahan | Sep. 1, 2022 |
20-16917
|
Manriquez v. Ensley
Officers were entitled to qualified immunity for Fourth Amendment violation stemming from failure to amend warrant to include judge's oral authorization expanding the warrant's scope. |
Qualified Immunity |
|
K. Lee | Aug. 31, 2022 |
20-17403
|
Seidner v. De Vries
Police officer was entitled to qualified immunity because his use of a roadblock to stop a fleeing bicyclist was a use of reasonable force under the circumstances. |
Qualified Immunity |
|
D. Forrest | Jul. 1, 2022 |
20-17144
|
Hughes v. Rodriguez
Officer was not entitled to qualified immunity as to escaped inmate's claimed post-handcuff beating and dog-biting during apprehension because beating a handcuffed convict violates the Eighth Amendment. |
Qualified Immunity |
|
C. Bea | Apr. 22, 2022 |
19-56462
|
Estate of Najera Aguirre v. County of Riverside
Police officer was not entitled to summary judgment based on qualified immunity because evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiffs, showed that his use of force was not objectively reasonable. |
Qualified Immunity |
|
M. McKeown | Mar. 25, 2022 |
19-55274
|
Benavidez v. County of San Diego
Precedent establishes right to be free from judicial deception in child custody proceedings; thus, dismissal on qualified immunity grounds was reversed. |
Qualified Immunity |
|
G. Katzmann | Apr. 13, 2021 |
17-16756
|
Jessop v. City of Fresno
Appellants failed to show that it was clearly established that Officers' alleged conduct violated Fourth Amendment; thus, Officers were protected by qualified immunity. |
Qualified Immunity |
|
M. Smith | Sep. 5, 2019 |