Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S102249
|
Gardner v. County of Sonoma
Map recorded before enactment of subdivision law does not create legally cognizable subdivisions. |
Real Property |
|
Oct. 1, 2003 | |
A092016
|
Drouet v. Superior Court of San Francisco County
Tenant may not prevent landlord from lawfully removing rental property from market by claiming retaliatory eviction. |
Real Property |
|
Aug. 10, 2003 | |
B149100
|
CUNA Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
In inverse condemnation action, trial court erred by requiring property owner to show 'but for' mitigation efforts, damage would have occurred. |
Real Property |
|
Jul. 29, 2003 | |
G030264
|
Harbor Island Holdings LLC v. Kim
Lease provision requiring double rent in event of breach is unenforceable as penalty. |
Real Property |
|
Jul. 25, 2003 | |
B155843
|
Lee v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transit Authority
Cause of action for inverse condemnation begins to accrue only when damage stabilizes. |
Real Property |
|
Jul. 25, 2003 | |
H020648
|
MHC Operating Limited Partnership v. City of San Jose
Substantial evidence supports hearing officer's conclusion that net operating income could be estimated for rent control purposes. |
Real Property |
|
Apr. 15, 2003 | |
A098336
|
Bullard v. San Francisco Rent Stabilization Board
Local regulation that dictates rental amount landlord may charge for replacement unit violates Costa-Hawkins Act. |
Real Property |
|
Apr. 3, 2003 | |
H022122
|
Topsail Court Homeowners Assn. v. County of Santa Cruz
Water treatment facility is not exempt from zoning regulations. |
Real Property |
|
Apr. 2, 2003 | |
B162084
|
Nicolopulos v. Superior Court (Bourgeois)
Property owner failed to show obligation under unrecorded promissory note had expired. |
Real Property |
|
Apr. 2, 2003 | |
A099318
|
Howard S. Wright Construction Co. v. Superior Court (BBIC Investors)
Notice of nonresponsibility may not shield property owner from mechanic's lien under participating owner doctrine. |
Real Property |
|
Apr. 2, 2003 | |
D038316
|
City of San Diego v. Rancho Penasquitos Partnership
Zoning restriction is inadmissible to show lower value of condemned property where both condemner and zoning authority are same entity. |
Real Property |
|
Mar. 31, 2003 | |
01-16269
|
Lane v. Residential Funding Corp.
Requirement that home buyer use particular title insurance company did not violate Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act. |
Real Property |
|
Mar. 26, 2003 | |
D039615
|
Save our NTC Inc. v. City of San Diego
Proposition D's 30-foot height zoning limitation does not apply to San Diego's redevelopment project. |
Real Property |
|
Mar. 26, 2003 | |
A097471
|
Syufy Enterprises LP v. City of Oakland
Subtenant is not entitled to remain on property after master tenant rejects lease in bankruptcy. |
Real Property |
|
Feb. 24, 2003 | |
D038865
|
Rolfe v. California Transportation Commission (San Diego Regional Transportation Commission)
California Dept. of Transportation need not obtain legislative approval before acquiring park property and converting it for nonpark use. |
Real Property |
|
Feb. 20, 2003 | |
A093139
|
Gardner v. County of Sonoma
Antiquated maps created before 1893 do not create legal parcels. |
Real Property |
|
Feb. 5, 2003 | |
G029055
|
Magna Enterprises Inc. v. Fidelity National Title Insurance Co.
Insurer had no duty to defend under title insurance policy where property owner had right of access, although difficult or impractical. |
Real Property |
|
Feb. 4, 2003 | |
C037628
|
Kellogg v. Garcia
An easement by necessity arises where U.S. government was common owner prior to conveyance. |
Real Property |
|
Feb. 3, 2003 | |
A093590
|
Lowenstein v. City of Lafayette
City is not liable for taking when it erroneously denied landowner's application for lot line adjustment. |
Real Property |
|
Jan. 7, 2003 | |
C036184
|
City of Lincoln v. Barringer
City was not required to give landowners 15 days' notice of public hearing regarding proposed taking. |
Real Property |
|
Nov. 25, 2002 | |
01-35610
|
King County v. Rasmussen
County owns fee simple estate in strip of land formerly used as railroad right of way. |
Real Property |
|
Oct. 10, 2002 | |
A090932
|
Emeryville Redevelopment Agency v. Harcros Pigment Inc.
Purchases of neighboring properties are inadmissible to establish market value of condemned property. |
Real Property |
|
Oct. 7, 2002 | |
G028000
|
Annod Corp. v. Hamilton & Samuels
Partners in law firm did not fraudulently avoid paying rent by receiving partnership draws. |
Real Property |
|
Oct. 2, 2002 | |
C038627
|
People v. Murrison
Landowner may not lawfully divert creek water without first notifying Dept. of Fish and Game. |
Real Property |
|
Oct. 2, 2002 | |
E030072
|
DMC Inc. v. Downey Savings and Loan Assn.
New purchase-money lien has priority over any revived junior lien. |
Real Property |
|
Oct. 1, 2002 | |
C036592
|
City of Ripon v. Sweetin
Evidence of city's alleged misconduct prior to condemnation proceedings should have been admitted to calculate damages. |
Real Property |
|
Sep. 30, 2002 | |
A097121
|
Johnston v. Sonoma County (City of Santa Rosa)
Transfer of utility easement over property preserved for open space to city under threat of condemnation does not require voter approval. |
Real Property |
|
Sep. 30, 2002 | |
C037523
|
Western Aggregates Inc. v. County of Yuba
Historic public road exists over land owned by mining company. |
Real Property |
|
Sep. 24, 2002 | |
27029-3
|
Borden v. City of Olympia
Owner whose property was flooded may sue city for negligence under duty of due care. |
Real Property |
|
Sep. 24, 2002 | |
27560-1
|
City of Burien v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management
City did not violate Growth Management Act by entering into interlocal agreement during negotiations closed to public. |
Real Property |
|
Sep. 24, 2002 |