For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices or call 949-702-5390.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court
Name Category Published
Madani v. Rabinowitz
Because next-door neighbor's fence was a continuing encroachment, plaintiff's claims for trespass and nuisance based on fence's encroachment were not barred by statute of limitations. 		Torts 2DCA/4 Feb. 26, 2020
Summer J. v. United States Baseball Federation
Stadium owners have a duty to take reasonable measures that would increase safety and minimize inherent risks without altering the nature of the game. 		Torts 2DCA/7 Feb. 20, 2020
Soto v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.
Defendant cannot be held liable for a dangerous condition of property it did not own or control even with expressed easement rights to the property. 		Torts 2DCA/7 Feb. 18, 2020
Alaniz v. Sun Pacific Shippers, L.P.
Trial court prejudicially erred when it omitted 'Privette and Hooker' doctrine limitations from its instructions on negligence and premises liability. 		Torts 2DCA/6 Feb. 6, 2020
Thimon v. City of Newark
City was not liable for creating dangerous condition of public property when victim was hit by driver in crosswalk because there was no history of collisions involving pedestrians in 10 years. 		Torts 1DCA/2 Jan. 29, 2020
Hedayatzadeh v. City of Del Mar
No liability for city not erecting a pedestrian barrier preventing the public from willfully accessing hazardous areas. 		Torts 4DCA/1 Jan. 24, 2020
Roger v. County of Riverside
Government Claims Act prohibited respondent from using 'timeliness' defense in litigation because respondent failed to notify complainant of defect in claim as required. 		Torts 4DCA/2 Jan. 24, 2020
LAOSD Asbestos Cases
Appellants' documents in opposition to respondent's expert's conclusion that respondent's talcum powder did not contain asbestos did not have 'specific facts' necessary to raise triable issue of material fact. 		Torts 2DCA/4 Jan. 24, 2020
Bingener v. City of Los Angeles
'Going and coming rule' under respondeat superior theory prevented employer from being held vicariously liable when employee hit and killed pedestrian while driving to work in his personal vehicle. 		Torts 2DCA/3 Jan. 13, 2020
Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. Ameron Pole Products LLC
Showing that respondent was not a cause-in-fact of car accident was not tantamount to showing that respondent was not a cause-in-fact of motorist's injuries. 		Torts 3DCA Dec. 30, 2019
City of Desert Hot Springs v. Valenti
Trial court applied improper legal standard to City's motion for appointment of receiver for nuisance by not addressing requirements in Health and Safety Code Section 17980.7(c), and instead addressing plan's economic viability. 		Torts 4DCA/2 Dec. 23, 2019
Kim v. County of Monterey
Triable issues exist where reasonable jury could find defendants' staging of racing event was "severe departure" from contractual obligations. 		Torts 6DCA Dec. 17, 2019
Modification: Presbyterian Camp & Conference Centers, Inc. v. Superior Court
Corporations can be held vicariously liable for causing brush fires under Health and Safety Code Sections 13009 and 13009.1; CalFire may recover fire suppression and investigation costs. 		Torts 2DCA/6 Dec. 10, 2019
Berg v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.
Plaintiffs did not present sufficient evidence to create a triable issue of whether defendant's products to which plaintiff was exposed actually contained asbestos. 		Torts 1DCA/1 Nov. 29, 2019
Presbyterian Camp & Conference Centers, Inc. v. Superior Court
Corporations can be held vicariously liable for causing brush fires under Health and Safety Code Sections 13009 and 13009.1; CalFire may recover fire suppression and investigation costs. 		Torts 2DCA/6 Nov. 19, 2019
Modification: Brown v. USA Taekwondo
Organization had special relationship with coach because organization implemented policies and procedures to protect athletes from sexual abuse by coaches, and organization barred coach from coaching athletes for violations of policies. 		Torts 2DCA/7 Nov. 7, 2019
Modification: Brown v. USA Taekwondo
Organization had special relationship with coach because organization implemented policies and procedures to protect athletes from sexual abuse by coaches, and organization barred coach from coaching athletes for violations of policies. 		Torts 2DCA/7 Nov. 6, 2019
Lopez v. The Hillshire Brands Co.
CACI No. 435 is appropriate to determine causation in an asbestos case; whether the defendant is a manufacturer or premises owner is irrelevant. 		Torts 1DCA/5 Nov. 1, 2019
Dobbs v. City of Los Angeles
Trial court rightly found that public employee reasonably exercised discretionary authority when approving bollards to protect convention center from car bombs; thus, design immunity defense to personal injury claim was satisfied. 		Torts 2DCA/8 Oct. 18, 2019
Kim v. U.S.
When tortfeasors have adopted a technical policy to evaluate the hazards caused by trees, the discretionary function of the Federal Tort Claims Act may not apply to dismiss the case. 		Torts 9th Oct. 11, 2019
Brown v. USA Taekwondo
Organization had special relationship with coach because organization implemented policies and procedures to protect athletes from sexual abuse by coaches, and organization barred coach from coaching athletes for violations of policies. 		Torts 2DCA/7 Oct. 10, 2019
Ghezavat v. Harris
CACI No. 724 adequately explained to jury that joint owner of truck was not liable for negligent entrustment if he did not permit tortfeasor's use. 		Torts 1DCA/5 Oct. 1, 2019
Modification: Mancini & Associates v. Schwetz
Civil Code Section 47(b) litigation privilege did not bar plaintiff's claims because defendant engaged in a course of tortious conduct depriving plaintiff of attorney fees. 		Torts 2DCA/6 Oct. 1, 2019
Jones v. Awad
To attach premises liability to an owner, the owner must have either actual or constructive knowledge of the dangerous condition. 		Torts 5DCA Sep. 19, 2019
Crouch v. Trinity Christian Center of Santa Ana, Inc.
Flying into tirade at 13-year-old girl who had been drugged and raped and yelling at her that she was stupid and it was her fault was sufficiently extreme and outrageous to impose liability. 		Torts 4DCA/3 Sep. 16, 2019
Mancini & Associates APLC v. Schwetz
Civil Code Section 47(b) litigation privilege did not bar plaintiff's claims because defendant engaged in a course of tortious conduct depriving plaintiff of attorney fees. 		Torts 2DCA/6 Sep. 5, 2019
Stephens v. Union Pacific Railroad
Plaintiff failed to create a genuine issue of fact on whether any asbestos exposure that might have occurred was a substantial factor in causing his disease, so his negligence claim failed. 		Torts 9th Aug. 29, 2019
Churchman v. Bay Area Rapid Transit Dist.
Train operator did not owe passenger heighted duty of care under Civil Code Section 2100 because her injuries were caused by ordinary risks of busy train platform. 		Torts 1DCA/5 Aug. 29, 2019
Voris v. Lampert
Conversion claim is not an appropriate remedy for nonpayment of wages, and Legislature's remedial scheme should not be modified to include conversion as a remedy. 		Torts CASC Aug. 16, 2019
Pina v. County of Los Angeles
When a medical witness' testimony is permitted for the limited purpose of impeachment, any additional contradicting medical opinions presented will be considered prejudicial error. 		Torts 2DCA/4 Aug. 9, 2019
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.