Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A156552
|
Frausto v. Dept. of the Cal. Highway Patrol
Law enforcement officers and arrestees have a special relationship where officers owe arrestees a duty of reasonable care. |
Torts |
|
J. Kline | Aug. 25, 2020 |
D075738
|
Bolger v. Amazon.com, LLC
Trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of retailer defendant because strict products liability doctrine applies to retailers. |
Torts |
|
P. Guerrero | Aug. 17, 2020 |
18-16349
|
In re Bard IVC Filters Product Liability Litigation
Food and Drug Administration special control requirements do not constitute device-specific requirements that preempt state-law claims for failure-to-warn. |
Torts |
|
E. Miller | Aug. 14, 2020 |
S250734
|
B.B. v. County of Los Angeles
A defendant who committed an intentional tort is not entitled to a reduced judgment merely because plaintiff's injuries also resulted from the negligence of others. |
Torts |
|
M. Chin | Aug. 11, 2020 |
19-16017
|
Dent v. National Football League
Plaintiffs sufficiently alleged voluntary undertaking theory of negligence to survive motion to dismiss. |
Torts |
|
R. Tallman | Aug. 10, 2020 |
S256927
|
Ixchel Pharma LLC v. Biogen Inc.
Tortious interference with at-will contracts requires independent wrongfulness. |
Torts |
|
G. Liu | Aug. 4, 2020 |
A157937
|
Wolf v. Weber
Trial court incorrectly granted defendant's motion for summary judgment because assumption of risk doctrine did not apply where ordinance required off leash dogs to be under owner's control. |
Torts |
|
A. Tucher | Jul. 21, 2020 |
B291120
|
Savaikie v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals
Agreement between defendant and its volunteer that volunteer would drive his own car, did not establish required-vehicle exception to establish defendant's employer liability. |
Torts |
|
M. Stratton | Jul. 20, 2020 |
B295829
|
Mize v. Mentor Worldwide LLC
Tort claims premised on conduct that both violates Medical Device Amendments and gives rise to recovery under state law even in absence of MDA are not preempted. |
Torts |
|
M. Tangeman | Jul. 7, 2020 |
B291609
|
Hanouchian v. Steele
Agreements to adhere to fraternal organization guidelines did not impose greater legal duty upon possessor of land than those imposed by current laws. |
Torts |
|
A. Egerton | Jun. 26, 2020 |
D072779
|
Pankey v. Petco Animal Supplies, Inc.
Only diseased animals displaying symptoms of illness are products subject to a products liability design defect claim. |
Torts |
|
R. Huffman | Jun. 25, 2020 |
A152318
|
Verrazono v. Gehl Company
'Ordinary consumers expectations' test is not applicable where expert testimony will be essential to assist jury in understanding pros and cons of plaintiff's arguments. |
Torts |
|
K. Banke | Jun. 18, 2020 |
B299605
|
Horne v. Ahern Rentals, Inc.
Hirer is only liable for injury to employee of contractor if hirer exercised control over safety conditions at worksite in way that 'affirmatively' contributed to employee's injuries. |
Torts |
|
E. Grimes | Jun. 12, 2020 |
B284002
|
Risperdal and Invega Cases
State-law failure-to-warn claims concerning prescription drugs are preempted only where there is clear evidence that FDA would have rejected proposed label change. |
Torts |
|
H. Dhanidina | Jun. 5, 2020 |
B297171
|
Wicks v. Antelope Valley Healthcare Dist.
Hospital was not liable for negligence of doctors because evidence showed decedent was notified that physicians were not hospital employees. |
Torts |
|
E. Grimes | Jun. 3, 2020 |
H044064
|
Sharufa v. Festival Fun Parks, LLC
Record did not contain enough evidence to show whether waterslide theme park patrons received service or were supplied product to address product liability claim. |
Torts |
|
A. Grover | May 29, 2020 |
A156562
|
Insalaco v. Hope Lutheran Church
Continuance of summary judgment hearing was virtually mandated because plaintiff provided declaration requesting specific discovery showing essential evidence may exist. |
Torts |
|
M. Miller | May 29, 2020 |
H046809
|
Nguyen v. Ford
Tolling provision no longer applied once plaintiff's former counsel filed notice to withdraw and plaintiff did not allege she was unaware. |
Torts |
|
A. Danner | May 15, 2020 |
G057486
|
Kurtz-Ahlers, LLC v. Bank of America N.A.
Trial court properly granted nonsuit for negligence claim against bank because banks have no duty to monitor customer accounts for fraud. |
Torts |
|
R. Aronson | May 11, 2020 |
B292448
|
Robertson v. Saadat
Plaintiff was not entitled to use her deceased husband's stored sperm for conception because decedent never expressed an intent to do so. |
Torts |
|
H. Bendix | May 6, 2020 |
A156761
|
Marez v. Lyft, Inc.
Defendant's activities at the time of the accident were not within the scope of his employment because they were solely personal and employer did not derive any benefit. |
Torts |
|
S. Margulies | May 4, 2020 |
B290013
|
Alaniz v. Sun Pacific Shippers
Trial court prejudicially erred when it omitted 'Privette/Hooker' elements from its instructions on negligence and premises liability. |
Torts |
|
M. Tangeman | Apr. 30, 2020 |
C080550
|
Weimer v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC
'Biakanja v. Irving' factors clearly weighed in favor of imposing duty of care on lenders who agree to renegotiating loan modifications. |
Torts |
|
W. Murray | Apr. 6, 2020 |
B290836
|
Reynaud v. Technicolor Creative Services USA
Jury could conclude if not for defendant's negligence, PERM application filed for plaintiff would probably have been approved and he would have obtained green card. |
Torts |
|
J. Ashmann-Gerst | Mar. 26, 2020 |
18-1171
|
Comcast Corp. v. National Assn. of African-American Owned Media
A 42 U.S.C. Section 1981 plaintiff continuously bears the burden of showing that plaintiff's race was a 'but-for' cause of its injury. |
Torts |
|
N. Gorsuch | Mar. 24, 2020 |
18-55020
|
Winter v. Gardens Regional Hospital and Medical Center
To be actionable under the False Claim Act, clinical judgments and opinions do not require objective falsehood. |
Torts |
|
M. Bennett | Mar. 24, 2020 |
D075872
|
K.G. v. S.B.
Providing family members with financial support does not establish a special relationship that imposes a duty on the party providing support to exercise care. |
Torts |
|
J. McConnell | Mar. 17, 2020 |
B292457
|
McHenry v. Asylum Entertainment Delaware, LLC
Superior court correctly ruled that plaintiff's Jones Act claim against production company failed as a matter of law because plaintiff was neither an employee nor 'borrowed' servant of the company. |
Torts |
|
B. Hoffstadt | Mar. 16, 2020 |
Modification: Summer J. v. United States Baseball Federation
Stadium owners have a duty to take reasonable measures that would increase safety and minimize inherent risks without altering the nature of the game. |
Torts |
|
Mar. 10, 2020 | ||
B292418
|
Zhang v. Chu
To prove malice in malicious prosecution claim, plaintiff must show defendant acted for purposes unrelated to merits of underlying claim. |
Torts |
|
J. Wiley | Mar. 9, 2020 |