For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices or call 949-702-5390.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Sign up for Daily Journal emails
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court
Name Category Published
Berg v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.
Plaintiffs did not present sufficient evidence to create a triable issue of whether defendant's products to which plaintiff was exposed actually contained asbestos. 		Torts 1DCA/1 Nov. 29, 2019
Presbyterian Camp & Conference Centers, Inc. v. Superior Court
Corporations can be held vicariously liable for causing brush fires under Health and Safety Code Sections 13009 and 13009.1; CalFire may recover fire suppression and investigation costs. 		Torts 2DCA/6 Nov. 19, 2019
Modification: Brown v. USA Taekwondo
Organization had special relationship with coach because organization implemented policies and procedures to protect athletes from sexual abuse by coaches, and organization barred coach from coaching athletes for violations of policies. 		Torts 2DCA/7 Nov. 7, 2019
Modification: Brown v. USA Taekwondo
Organization had special relationship with coach because organization implemented policies and procedures to protect athletes from sexual abuse by coaches, and organization barred coach from coaching athletes for violations of policies. 		Torts 2DCA/7 Nov. 6, 2019
Lopez v. The Hillshire Brands Co.
CACI No. 435 is appropriate to determine causation in an asbestos case; whether the defendant is a manufacturer or premises owner is irrelevant. 		Torts 1DCA/5 Nov. 1, 2019
Dobbs v. City of Los Angeles
Trial court rightly found that public employee reasonably exercised discretionary authority when approving bollards to protect convention center from car bombs; thus, design immunity defense to personal injury claim was satisfied. 		Torts 2DCA/8 Oct. 18, 2019
Kim v. U.S.
When tortfeasors have adopted a technical policy to evaluate the hazards caused by trees, the discretionary function of the Federal Tort Claims Act may not apply to dismiss the case. 		Torts 9th Oct. 11, 2019
Brown v. USA Taekwondo
Organization had special relationship with coach because organization implemented policies and procedures to protect athletes from sexual abuse by coaches, and organization barred coach from coaching athletes for violations of policies. 		Torts 2DCA/7 Oct. 10, 2019
Ghezavat v. Harris
CACI No. 724 adequately explained to jury that joint owner of truck was not liable for negligent entrustment if he did not permit tortfeasor's use. 		Torts 1DCA/5 Oct. 1, 2019
Modification: Mancini & Associates v. Schwetz
Civil Code Section 47(b) litigation privilege did not bar plaintiff's claims because defendant engaged in a course of tortious conduct depriving plaintiff of attorney fees. 		Torts 2DCA/6 Oct. 1, 2019
Jones v. Awad
To attach premises liability to an owner, the owner must have either actual or constructive knowledge of the dangerous condition. 		Torts 5DCA Sep. 19, 2019
Crouch v. Trinity Christian Center of Santa Ana, Inc.
Flying into tirade at 13-year-old girl who had been drugged and raped and yelling at her that she was stupid and it was her fault was sufficiently extreme and outrageous to impose liability. 		Torts 4DCA/3 Sep. 16, 2019
Mancini & Associates APLC v. Schwetz
Civil Code Section 47(b) litigation privilege did not bar plaintiff's claims because defendant engaged in a course of tortious conduct depriving plaintiff of attorney fees. 		Torts 2DCA/6 Sep. 5, 2019
Stephens v. Union Pacific Railroad
Plaintiff failed to create a genuine issue of fact on whether any asbestos exposure that might have occurred was a substantial factor in causing his disease, so his negligence claim failed. 		Torts 9th Aug. 29, 2019
Churchman v. Bay Area Rapid Transit Dist.
Train operator did not owe passenger heighted duty of care under Civil Code Section 2100 because her injuries were caused by ordinary risks of busy train platform. 		Torts 1DCA/5 Aug. 29, 2019
Voris v. Lampert
Conversion claim is not an appropriate remedy for nonpayment of wages, and Legislature's remedial scheme should not be modified to include conversion as a remedy. 		Torts CASC Aug. 16, 2019
Pina v. County of Los Angeles
When a medical witness' testimony is permitted for the limited purpose of impeachment, any additional contradicting medical opinions presented will be considered prejudicial error. 		Torts 2DCA/4 Aug. 9, 2019
Potocki v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Plaintiffs stated a claim under Homeowner Bill of Rights Section 2923.6(f) because Wells Fargo's explanation for denying Home Affordable Modification Program modification was insufficient to sustain a demurrer. 		Torts 3DCA Aug. 9, 2019
Sheen v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Lenders owe no common law duty to offer, consider, or approve loan modifications, so plaintiff's negligence claim was properly dismissed. 		Torts 2DCA/8 Aug. 6, 2019
Modification: Baker-Smith v. Skolnick
An excuse jury instruction under theory of negligence per se is improper unless special circumstances exist; legal error warranted reversal of judgment. 		Torts 2DCA/8 Jul. 31, 2019
Huckey v. City of Temecula
Under the trivial defect doctrine, a defect in a sidewalk is trivial as a matter of law when the defect is slight and creates no risk of serious injury. 		Torts 4DCA/2 Jul. 29, 2019
Adhav v. Midway Rent A Car, Inc.
Defendants engaged in no illegal or fraudulent conduct in their dealings with plaintiffs who purchased optional insurance coverage for rental vehicles, so plaintiffs' Unfair Competition Law claims failed. 		Torts 2DCA/1 Jul. 26, 2019
Potter v. Alliance United Ins. Co.
Trial court improperly sustained defendant's demurrer because plaintiff stated a proper fraudulent conveyance claim under California's Uniform Voidable Transactions Act. 		Torts 2DCA/5 Jul. 25, 2019
Doe v. Dept. of Children & Family Services
Nonsuit was proper because plaintiff's evidence failed to establish private defendants had duty to protect plaintiff from third-parties' crimes, and county defendants' breaches of mandatory duties were not proximate cause of harm. 		Torts 2DCA/8 Jul. 19, 2019
Williams v. Fremont Corners, Inc.
Under California law, landowners are required to maintain land in their possession and control in a reasonably safe condition, but they have no duty to protect from third party conduct. 		Torts 6DCA Jul. 19, 2019
Baker-Smith v. Skolnick
An excuse jury instruction under theory of negligence per se is improper unless special circumstances exist; legal error warranted reversal of judgment. 		Torts 2DCA/8 Jul. 12, 2019
Johnson & Johnson Talcum Powder Cases
Substantial evidence supported jury's finding that defendant breached duty to warn of risks of ovarian cancer from genital talc use; thus, judgment notwithstanding the verdict partially reversed. 		Torts 2DCA/3 Jul. 12, 2019
Hernandez v. First Student, Inc.
Evidence of a parent's drug use, and how it relates to her relationship with her child, was relevant in determining the damages awarded in wrongful death cause of action. 		Torts 2DCA/8 Jul. 12, 2019
Hernandez v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co. of S.F.
No triable issue regarding defendant's liability as a successor in interest of rental car company, because rental car company's asset sale did not destroy plaintiff's remedies against it. 		Torts 1DCA/4 Jul. 10, 2019
Amended Opinion: Doe v. Nestle
Presumption against extraterritoriality applies to claims under the Alien Tort Statute, though alleged domestic contacts in form of 'kickbacks' outside typical business contract may suffice to rebut presumption. 		Torts 9th Jul. 8, 2019
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.