Consumer Law
False Claims Act
Electronic Surveillance Services
John C. Prather on behalf of himself and the United States of America California, Delaware, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Massachusetts, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Rhode Island, Virginia, and the District of Columbia v. AT&T Inc., Cellco Partnership dba Verizon Communications, Qwest Communications International Inc., and
Published: Nov. 23, 2013 | Result Date: Nov. 5, 2013 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: 3:09-cv-02457-CRB Bench Decision – Dismissal
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Already a subscriber?
Sign In