This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Firm Profile

Brothers in Law

Mendez & Sanchez

2026-01-15

MCLE

How plaintiffs use Section 998 offers to compromise in employment discrimination cases

Jan. 15, 2026

While FEHA already provides for fee recovery, an offer to...

By Sean M. Novak

Department of Labor misinterprets VEVRAA, weakening veteran hiring requirements

Jan. 9, 2026

Federal contractors are supposed to give hiring preferenc...

By Eileen C. Moore

What California's plastic bag ban reveals about regulating waste by material type

Jan. 8, 2026

California's 2026 carryout bag law closes the thick plast...

By Roberto Escobar


Today's News

Litigation & Arbitration


In just 10 years, Larson LLP has grown from a Los Angeles boutique into a 60-lawyer "big-case platform" with offices on two continents. But the firm's leader...


Judges and Judiciary


AB 1544 follows incidents in which journalists were barred from immigration court proceedings, raising questions about state authority over federal courts.


Judges and Judiciary


Federal prosecutors say Orange County Superior Court Judge Israel Claustro defrauded California's workers' compensation system by secretly operating a medica...


The hearing follows months of dispute over overburdened attorneys in the San Francisco Public Defender's Office and the declaration of "unavailable" days.


The petition seeks to compel Wolfire Games to comply with an arbitrator-issued subpoena, testing statutory changes that expanded arbitrators' authority to ob...


A federal judge ordered Los Angeles to pay $1.8 million in attorney fees, faulting the city for failing to provide accurate homelessness data and comply with...


Columns

Be Proactive: State Bar recommendations for trust account compliance

Jan. 15, 2026
By Steven Moawad, Jennifer Stalvey

With trust account compliance reviews expanding in 2026, now is the time for California attorneys to adopt stronger recordkeep...


Obituaries

Robert K. Tanenbaum's life--spanning courtroom triumphs, public service and bestselling novels--offers a blueprint for lawyers...


Technology, Intellectual Property

AI lawsuits shift from copyright to human harm

Jan. 15, 2026
By James Rubinowitz

As courts move past IP disputes, the next wave of AI litigation is turning toward real-world harms--and testing whether tradit...



Verdicts & Settlements

Due Process Violation Estate of William Hayden Sc... $16,000,000
Wage and Hour The People of the State of ... $9,250,000
Negligent Care James Doherty Jr., et al. v... $7,637,000
Gender Discrimination Clare Weber, Anissa Rogers ... $6,000,000
Malpractice Doe Wife and Children v. Ro... $1,800,000
Wage and Hour Tina L. Hess, on behalf of ... $1,600,000
Police Misconduct Kyle Johnson v. City of San... $1,400,000
Auto v. Auto Francisco Reyes v. John Ho... $1,000,000
Truck v. Truck Bradford White v. YSV Truck... $873,548
Wage and Hour Rebecca Rivera, an individu... $850,000

On the Move

K&L Gates

Jan. 7, 2026


Zachary Timm was promoted to partner of K&L Gates in Los Angeles. The promotion is effective Jan. 1, 2026.

Timm focuses his practice on intellectual property litigation, labor and employment related litigation, business litigation, and class action defense. He has represented public and private companies in litigation involving claims for trade secrets misappropriation, tortious interference, employment discrimination, wrongful termination, wage and hour violations, breach of contract, false advertising, unfair competition, and fraud.


Neil A. Eddington was promoted to partner of K&L Gates in Los Angeles. The promotion is effective Jan. 1, 2026.

Eddington handles a wide range of employment-related cases; he is most often called upon to leverage his experience in litigating and advising on wage and hour issues. Eddington oversees single plaintiff and collective actions (class action and PAGA claims) alleging wage and hour violations, including regular rate of pay, overtime, and meal and rest break issues, among others.


Details

K&L Gates has 2000 attorneys in 45 offices including Los Angeles, Orange County, Palo Alto and San Francisco. Among the law firm’s key practice areas are Corporate/M&A, Energy & Infrastructure, Finance, Litigation & Dispute Resolution, and Intellectual Property. The firm’s website is klgates.com/

Featured Content


Community News

Los Angeles Superior Court launched Court Commons, a mobile exhibition offering legal education, resources for self-represente...



Podcasts

Davis Wright Tremaine's Vid Prabhakaran joins In the Counsel's Chair to break down three of the biggest challenges facing the ...


Daily Appellate Report

Environmental Law, Water Rights

City of Vallejo v. City of American Canyon

Environmental Impact Report's water analysis for development project was sufficient for Environmental Quality Act purposes where it showed water was reasonably likely to be available from...


Remedies, Employment Law

The Merchant of Tennis v. Superior Court (Garcia)

Rescission laws required a curative notice to inform putative class members that rescinding their individual settlement agreements may obligate them to return settlement consideration if ...


Criminal Law and Procedure, Constitutional Law

Microsoft Corp. v. Superior Court (City of Los Angeles)

LAPD nondisclosure order prohibiting Microsoft from notifying USC of the existence of warrant did not violate the California Electronic Communications Privacy Act (CalECPA) or Microsoft's...


Employment Discrimination

Modification: Carroll v. City and County of San Francisco

San Francisco's methods for calculating employee disability retirement benefits did not discriminate based on age of entry into the City's retirement system.


Public Records Act

City of Gilroy v. Superior Court (Law Foundation of Silicon Valley)

California Public Records Act permits declaratory relief addressing past violations when such relief is likely to affect future public-records requests or agency conduct.