This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Firm Profile

Brothers in Law

Mendez & Sanchez

2026-01-16

From The Archive


MCLE

How plaintiffs use Section 998 offers to compromise in employment discrimination cases

Jan. 15, 2026

While FEHA already provides for fee recovery, an offer to...

By Sean M. Novak

Department of Labor misinterprets VEVRAA, weakening veteran hiring requirements

Jan. 9, 2026

Federal contractors are supposed to give hiring preferenc...

By Eileen C. Moore

What California's plastic bag ban reveals about regulating waste by material type

Jan. 8, 2026

California's 2026 carryout bag law closes the thick plast...

By Roberto Escobar


Today's News

Civil Litigation


John Mirisch argues Beverly Hills is unlawfully applying a voter-approved term-limits ordinance retroactively and seeks a court order requiring the city cler...


A former 20-year employee alleges he was fired after repeatedly raising concerns about potential contamination in Boehringer Ingelheim's Cyltezo, a biosimila...


The petition seeks to compel Wolfire Games to comply with an arbitrator-issued subpoena, testing statutory changes that expanded arbitrators' authority to ob...


California Supreme Court


In the first case of its kind to reach the Supreme Court, justices directed the 3rd District Court of Appeal to reconsider sanctions over a brief containing ...


Judge Eumi K. Lee criticized both sides for missing multiple deadlines, including Tesla's months-late answer to an amended complaint, and set a January deadl...


A Los Angeles County jury began a damages-only trial Thursday as cannabis businesses allege the 2017 Thomas Fire and subsequent debris flows destroyed their ...


Columns

Despite strong diversity policies and research like the Justice Gap Study, the State Bar largely protects wealthy civil client...


Generative AI may be transforming the world, but arbitrators remain notably cautious, if not resistant, to letting it into the...


Successful settlement conferences depend on often-overlooked fundamentals like timing, case knowledge and preparation--includi...



Verdicts & Settlements

Securities Exchange Act In re Zoom Securities Litig... $150,000,000
Wage and Hour Tricia Yeomans, Ismail Chra... $65,000,000
Lucky Chances Inc.; V C Car... $43,300,000
Auto v. Auto Briana Booth v. Samantha De... $32,500,000
False Claims Act U.S., et al. ex rel. Zimnis... $18,282,280
Consumers Legal Remedies Act In re VNGR Beverage LLC Lit... $8,900,000
Wrongful Death Angela McGaff, individually... $8,500,000
Retaliation Tamara Evans v. California ... $7,651,373
Unfair Competition The People of the State of ... $5,100,000
Wage and Hour Thanh Phan, an individual, ... $4,000,000

On the Move

Gupta Wessler LLP

Jan. 16, 2026


Hannah Kieschnick joined Gupta Wessler LLP as a counsel in San Francisco. The move was Jan. 5, 2026.

Kieschnick litigates complex public interest and plaintiff-side cases across the country. She formerly served as senior attorney at Public Justice, where she successfully achieved justice for last-mile delivery drivers in Adler v. Gruma Corp., and preserved consumers' right to seek relief in court against opaque digital contracting practices in Parisi v. GreenSky, LLC.


Details

Gupta Wessler LLP has 14 attorneys in 2 offices including San Francisco. Among the law firm’s key practice areas are Appellate. The firm’s website is https://www.guptawessler.com

Featured Content


Community News

Los Angeles Superior Court launched Court Commons, a mobile exhibition offering legal education, resources for self-represente...



Podcasts

Davis Wright Tremaine's Vid Prabhakaran joins In the Counsel's Chair to break down three of the biggest challenges facing the ...


Daily Appellate Report

Environmental Law, Water Rights

City of Vallejo v. City of American Canyon

Environmental Impact Report's water analysis for development project was sufficient for Environmental Quality Act purposes where it showed water was reasonably likely to be available from...


Remedies, Employment Law

The Merchant of Tennis v. Superior Court (Garcia)

Rescission laws required a curative notice to inform putative class members that rescinding their individual settlement agreements may obligate them to return settlement consideration if ...


Criminal Law and Procedure, Constitutional Law

Microsoft Corp. v. Superior Court (City of Los Angeles)

LAPD nondisclosure order prohibiting Microsoft from notifying USC of the existence of warrant did not violate the California Electronic Communications Privacy Act (CalECPA) or Microsoft's...


Employment Discrimination

Modification: Carroll v. City and County of San Francisco

San Francisco's methods for calculating employee disability retirement benefits did not discriminate based on age of entry into the City's retirement system.


Public Records Act

City of Gilroy v. Superior Court (Law Foundation of Silicon Valley)

California Public Records Act permits declaratory relief addressing past violations when such relief is likely to affect future public-records requests or agency conduct.