This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Judicial Profile

Judge Enrique Guerrero lets attorneys build their record

Enrique Guerrero
San Bernardino County Superior Court

2026-03-06

From The Archive


MCLE

Why good mediation briefs matter

Feb. 13, 2026

A strong mediation brief isn't just paperwork--it sharpen...

By Scott Hengesbach

The power of communication in keeping cases moving and clients happy

Feb. 13, 2026

Cases stall not from law, but from silence. A quick call ...

By Robyn E. Frick

IRS Notice 2025-69: How the new deductions for tips and overtime work in 2025

Feb. 11, 2026

The IRS issued Notice 2025‑69 to guide taxpayers on claim...

By Daniel Chung


Today's News

Ethics/Professional Responsibility


A San Francisco judge denied without prejudice a New York lawyer's pro hac vice application in Aurora Solar's trade secrets case, citing insufficient informa...


A federal judge signaled approval of Grubhub's $24.75 million settlement with California delivery drivers in a long-running misclassification lawsuit, pendin...


Judges and Judiciary


Plaintiff's attorney alleges dental malpractice case was steered by the recused judge to his former law firm partner rather than it being randomly reassigned...


LA Fires


A proposed class action alleges Farmers Insurance relied on flawed environmental testing to deny smoke and ash damage claims from the 2025 Eaton Fire, endang...


Elon Musk told a federal jury his tweet pausing the $44 billion Twitter deal was literal and not meant to move markets, as investors claim it was part of a s...


U.S. Magistrate Judge Steve Kim ordered an in-person deposition and warned of "zero tolerance" for delays while partially granting Patagonia's sanctions moti...


Columns

Why civility still wins in the courtroom

Mar. 6, 2026
By Nancy Wieben Stock, Scott M. Gordon

Civility isn't just good manners -- it's a strategic advantage that can enhance your credibility, persuade judges, and ultimat...


Tax practitioners must prioritize ethical duties and thorough research over timing and efficiency concerns when advising clien...


Admitting testimony regarding business records

Mar. 6, 2026
By Jay M. Spillane

When contract disputes reach trial, the outcome often turns not just on what was written, but on what was said, intended and p...



Verdicts & Settlements

Unruh Civil Rights Act Allan Candelore, on his own... $60,500,000
Negligence Toriano Byrd, Toni Espinosa... $14,950,200
Auto v. Pedestrian Newcomb v. Wahlund Construc... $13,375,000
Auto v. Auto Kian Logan Riahi v. Ricardo... $7,515,000
Wage and Hour Louis C. Berreyes, individu... $4,880,000
Wrongful Termination Randy Pinnelli v. Community... $4,318,000
Wrongful Termination Lauren Warrem v. San Diego ... $4,181,000
Securities Exchange Act In re Robinhood Order Flow ... $2,000,000
Auto v. Auto Juan Gonzalez Serrano v. LA... $1,982,000
Wage and Hour Edgardo Marquina, Marvin Lo... $1,837,500

On the Move

Shook Hardy & Bacon

Mar. 6, 2026


Nalani L. Crisologo was promoted to partner of Shook Hardy & Bacon in Los Angeles.

Crisologo focuses her practice on product liability matters of all types, including warranty, product injury, product defect and marketing class actions, and appeals. She also manages defense efforts in parallel class action opt out cases. Crisologo specializes in developing and advancing creative arguments to limit class action and opt out litigation exposure. For example, she crafted and argued a novel motion to limit class action tolling in parallel class action opt out cases. She has also pioneered arguments to allow automakers to enforce arbitration clauses contained in California automotive sales contracts.


Karyn L. Ihara was promoted to partner of Shook Hardy & Bacon in Los Angeles.

Ihara's practice has consisted primarily of defending automotive companies in consumer actions in federal and state courts, as well as arbitration. She has won a jury trial, a bench trial and two arbitration hearings. Her experience includes providing strategic advice to clients, defending complex discovery matters, as well as significant motion work. As part of her practice, she has regularly attended court hearings, conducts and defends depositions, attends vehicle inspections, participates in mediations and settlement conferences and negotiates settlements.


Jimmy Y. Park was promoted to partner of Shook Hardy & Bacon in Los Angeles.

Park represents business clients in commercial litigation matters. His experience includes representing major Global 500 companies in product liability and consumer warranty litigation. He has represented some of the world's best-known automotive manufacturers and distributors, and has experience representing his clients in multidistrict litigation and coordinated proceedings in California and nationwide. Park's experience includes a secondment with a major automotive distributor managing product liability cases.


Shane B. Kolding was promoted to partner of Shook Hardy & Bacon in San Francisco.

Kolding focuses his practice on product liability litigation. He has experience in all aspects of civil litigation, in both federal and state court. He served one year after law school as a legal research attorney at the San Francisco Superior Court, where he conducted research and ex parte hearings for judges.


Melina Manetti was promoted to partner of Shook Hardy & Bacon in San Francisco.

Manetti focuses her practice on defending companies in class actions and product liability litigation. She represents manufacturers of a wide variety of products, including automotives, medical devices, personal care products, consumer goods and chemicals. Manetti also represents clients facing complex commercial litigation issues and high-stakes business disputes in financial services, insurance, commercial real estate and other industries. In addition, Manetti has partnered with clients to defend against labeling and advertising claims and claims under California's Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act (Prop 65). Her experience spans all stages of litigation, from initial filing, through discovery and motion practice, to trial and appeal.


Details

Shook Hardy & Bacon has 554 attorneys in 18 offices including Los Angeles; San Francisco, Orange County. Among the law firm’s key practice areas are Litigation, employment, trusts & estates, real estate, corporate. The firm’s website is shb.com

Featured Content


Community News



Podcasts

Melanie Chaney, firm-wide managing partner of Liebert Cassidy Whitmore, on how mid-size firms can innovate without the budget ...


Daily Appellate Report

Fees and Costs, Environmental Law

Physicians for Social Responsibility - Los Angeles v. Dept. of Toxic Substances Control

Plaintiffs, the non-prevailing party in a CEQA action, were not entitled to attorneys' fees under the "catalyst theory" because a judicial resolution on the merits had been reached.


Evidence

LAOSD Asbestos Cases

Because defendant abandoned a *Kelly* novelty challenge and instead argued reliability, the trial court properly evaluated expert testimony under *Sargon* and did not abuse its discretion...


Administrative Agencies

Harrington v. Housing Authority of Riverside County

Reversal was required where trial court misunderstood the scope of its independent review of Housing Authority's decision to terminate Section 8 benefits.


Immigration

Chairez v. Mayorkas

Because statute commits decision to Secretary of Homeland Security's discretion and statutory language provides only guidance, not a judicially enforceable standard, nonimmigrant U-visa w...


Immigration

Pacito v. Trump

Plaintiffs failed to establish that they were likely to succeed on the merits of their challenges to Executive Order suspending refugee entry under the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program (US...