This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...



Special Reports

Top 40 Under 40 2025

Oct. 22, 2025

ADR Profile

To Sum It Up

Richard M. Segal
ADR Services, Inc.

Firm Profile

Driven to Win

Goyette, Ruano & Thompson Inc.

2025-10-24

From The Archive


MCLE

When plaintiffs sell their legal claims, who pays taxes and when?

Oct. 23, 2025

As more plaintiffs look to sell their legal claims, the q...

By Robert W. Wood

Ethics of preparing legal opinions for third parties

Oct. 20, 2025

Lawyers asked to prepare evaluations for third-party use ...

By Alanna G. Clair, Shari L. Klevens

When heirs span borders mistakes can cost executors dearly

Oct. 15, 2025

California personal representatives must conduct diligen...

By Charlotte Ito


Today's News

Technology, Intellectual Property, Civil Litigation


Author Tasha Alexander alleges Apple trained its 'Apple Intelligence' model using her books without permission.


Technology, Intellectual Property, Civil Litigation


Author Tasha Alexander alleges Apple trained its 'Apple Intelligence' model using her books without permission.


State Bar & Bar Associations


Justices instead approved only installment-payment clarifications, adopted (with modifications) cross-state license recognition for military personnel and sp...


Civil Procedure


Presiding Judge Sergio C. Tapia II said Los Angeles Superior Court is partnering with Stanford, UCLA, and RAND to improve efficiency and access to justice, c...


9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals


Several liberal judges issue sharp dissents as the appeals court lets stand a stay of a San Francisco judge's order stopping the use of federalized National ...


Technology, Intellectual Property, Civil Litigation


Author Tasha Alexander alleges Apple trained its 'Apple Intelligence' model using her books without permission.


Columns

California voters have long wielded influence over insurance regulation through ballot initiatives, from Proposition 103's swe...


Once limited mostly to defamation and media cases, California's anti-SLAPP statute (Code Civ. Proc. § 425.16) has expanded int...


October's National Disability Employment Awareness Month should prompt Big Law to examine how its practices continue to margin...



Verdicts & Settlements

Breach of Contract Shashikant Jogani v. Haresh... $10,000,000,000
Premises Liability Victor Angelo Hipolito, a m... $30,000,000
Dangerous Condition of Public Property Jean Yuna Horihata, Mark Ra... $9,500,000
Excessive Force Maritza Padilla, individual... $3,060,000
Intentional Concealment DJCBP Corporation dba Tier ... $1,829,000
Auto v. Pedestrian John Doe v. Jane Roe, Roe M... $1,515,000
Negligent Care Jane Doe v. Roe Nursing Fac... $975,000
Mortuary Negligence Sheila Esfahani Goe, et al.... $950,000
Auto v. Auto John Doe and Jane Doe v. Un... $520,000
Premises Liability Wanda Rudison, Ryan Pennell... $400,000

On the Move

Knobbe Martens

Oct. 24, 2025


Charlene Azema was elected co-chair of trademark and brand protection group of the Irvine office of Knobbe Martens. Her tenure was effective Oct. 22, 2025.

Azema counsels clients in domestic and international trademark and copyright portfolio management, including enforcement, and developing IP procurement and expansion strategies. She also advises clients on brand marketing and advertising, domain names, and social media matters. Azema works with clients across an array of industries, including fashion and apparel, food and beverage, ad tech, medical devices, and technology.


Greg Phillips was elected co-chair of trademark and brand protection group of the Irvine office of Knobbe Martens.

Phillips advises clients on trademark and copyright matters worldwide, including clearance, registration, enforcement, and licensing. His work extends across a number of industries, including automotive, medical devices, pharmaceuticals, personnel placement and consulting services, fashion and apparel, and others.


Details

Knobbe Martens has 300 attorneys in 7 offices including Los Angeles, Irvine, San Diego, San Francisco . Among the law firm’s key practice areas are Intellectual Property . The firm’s website is https://www.knobbe.com

Featured Content


Community News

Firm leaders, clients, and alumni gathered Wednesday at the Academy Museum of Motion Pictures to celebrate Duane Morris LLP's 20th anniversary in Los Angeles, highlighting two decades of growth and collaboration.



Podcasts

Introducing In the Counsel's Chair, a new podcast from the Daily Journal launching October 27.



Daily Appellate Report

Criminal Law and Procedure

People v. Feise

Trial court did not err by imposing a five-year enhancement on DUI defendant for causing victim paralysis, as a jury could reasonably reach the paralysis enhancement without expert medica...


Criminal Law and Procedure

People v. Guzman

When an objection to a peremptory challenge under CCP section 231.7 is erroneously sustained, the "deemed prejudicial" standard, which requires reversal and a new trial, does not apply.


Criminal Law and Procedure

People v. Lara

Defendant entitled to youthful offender parole hearing was not serving the functional equivalent of life without parole and was ineligible for resentencing relief under Penal Code section...


Civil Procedure

SuperTECH Inc. v. My Choice Software LLC

California-based corporation was subject to Northern Mariana Islands Commonwealth's jurisdiction because it conducted business in the Commonwealth, with its dispute arising from that acti...


Criminal Law and Procedure

People v. Riddle

After defendant's planned residential treatment fell through, trial court acted within its discretion in terminating mental health diversion and refusing to compel public payment for priv...