This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...






ADR Profile

No Hard Feelings

Victoria G. Chaney
ADR Services, Inc.

2025-09-04

MCLE

US space operations in the 'gray zone'

Aug. 22, 2025

Rising launch activity at Vandenberg Space Force Base has...

By Michael Beckwith, Dorn McGrath

Parallel proceedings, conflicting rules: Managing civil and criminal exposure

Aug. 21, 2025

When civil and criminal cases overlap, conflicting rules ...

By Reza Torkzadeh, Allen P. Wilkinson

Stablecoins gain clarity under GENIUS Act as legal questions linger for banks and fintechs

Aug. 20, 2025

The law brings long-awaited clarity to stablecoins but l...

By Maxwell Earp-Thomas, Moorari Shah


Today's News

Both lawsuits are being handled by attorneys from the U.S. Attorney's Office's Complex and Defensive Litigation Section.


Torts/Personal Injury


Alameda County Judge Keith Fong ruled Oakland Airport's erasure of slip-and-fall video wasn't willful spoliation, finding other evidence preserved plaintiff'...


Constitutional Law, Business Law


Orange County Superior Court Judge Lee Gabriel denied Joshua Cua's anti-SLAPP motion in Beverage Visions, LLC v. Cua, holding that texts to BV customers--inc...


Immigration, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals


With one 9th Circuit panel having partially stayed the injunction, a separate panel questioned whether Trump's refugee-entry order is truly temporary and wh...


Judge Laura Seigle urged efficiency in discovery for the Eaton Canyon fire litigation, discouraging use of the phrase "fake responses" and suggesting categor...


Seeking to overturn a $100,000 noneconomic-damages award in Franklin v. Geragos, Geragos' counsel filed a pocket brief arguing no causation and a statute-of-...


Columns

Entertainment & Sports

From nuclear satire to political farce, these movies offer a prophetic lens on the dangers of Trump's leadership.


Despite decades of government assurances that he was a U.S. citizen, Roberto Moncada was stripped of that status -- exposing h...


Family

Navigating the challenge of subsequent restraining orders under California's DVPA

Sep. 3, 2025
By Firdaus F. Dordi, Rosa Vaquera-Martinez

California's domestic violence law leaves unresolved questions about how courts should handle subsequent restraining orders wh...



Verdicts & Settlements

Wage and Hour Josue Gutierrez, individual... $1,349,997
Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress Rachel Scanlon, et al. v. C... $850,000
Wage and Hour Salvador Mesa, an individua... $600,000
Inverse Condemnation David Catton v. City of San... $420,000
FEHA Damian Brown v. Los Angeles... $345,000
Wage and Hour Marisol Flores, individuall... $315,000
Wage and Hour Lisset Tredo, et al. v. Ade... $300,000
Securities Exchange Act Securities and Exchange Com... $300,000
Wage and Hour Aurelio Aguilar, individual... $250,000
Wage and Hour Michael Garcia and Miguel M... $250,000

On the Move

Signature Resolution

Aug. 29, 2025


Jonathan E. Karesh joined Signature Resolution as a neutral in San Mateo County.

Appointed by Gov. Gray Davis in 2001, Judge Karesh handled personal injury, construction defect and conservatorship cases. As Civil Law and Motion Judge in 2016, he managed summary judgments, discovery disputes and complex pretrial motions. The San Mateo County Trial Lawyers Association named him Judge of the Year in 2018. As presiding judge from 2019-2023, Karesh led the court through COVID-19, resuming jury trials within six months using temporary courtrooms at the San Mateo County Fairgrounds--an innovation recognized statewide. Karesh served on California's Judicial Selection Advisory Committee (2019-2023) and spent over a decade as deputy district attorney specializing in civil asset forfeiture. He began in private practice handling personal injury and product liability.


Details

Signature Resolution has 99 neutrals in 11 offices including Bakersfield, Century City, Los Angeles, Oakland, Orange County, San Diego, San Francisco, Silicon Valley. Among the law firm's key practice areas are Business & Commercial Contracts Civil Rights Construction Consumer Protection​ Corporations & Partnerships Employment Entertainment Government & Public Sector Disputes Insurance Coverage/Bad Faith Medical Malpractice PAGA Personal Injury Professional Liability Real Estate Sexual Assault Claims Tort Disputes Trade Secrets Wage & Hour.. The firm’s website is signatureresolution.com

Featured Content


Community News

Slideshow, Community News


Coalition of diverse bar associations honors founding leaders and judicial appointees at California Yacht Club



Daily Appellate Report

REPLACEMENT COPY OF TUESDAY, AUGUST 19, 2025

Criminal Law and Procedure

Segura v. Superior Court (People)

For misdemeanor pretrial military diversion eligibility, veterans need only show a reasonable possibility of a service-related condition, not a nexus to the offense.


Remedies

Doe v. County of Orange

Employee's willful disclosure of confidential Welfare and Institutions Code section 5150 record to plaintiff's relative despite knowing she lacked entitlement required awarding of treble ...


Criminal Law and Procedure

People v. Parker

Trial court declining to give Judicial Council instruction on voluntary intoxication was not error where it provided an instruction that, when considered alongside other instructions, pro...


Criminal Law and Procedure

U.S. v. Taylor

District court revoking supervised release may sanction defendant based on violent history, breach of trust, and recidivism risk by imposing a lengthier sentence than suggested by Sentenc...


Securities

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Sripetch

Disgorgement under the Securities and Exchange Act did not require a showing that the victims suffered pecuniary harm.