This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...



ADR Profile

The Activist

Kendall J. Newman
Judicate West

Firm Profile

Senior Counsel

Valentine Law Group
Specializes in Elder Abuse

2025-12-05

MCLE

The hidden hand of law in the life of art

Dec. 5, 2025

The law shapes every stage of a work of art's life -- fro...

By Simon J. Frankel

Military bases' new names sound like the old Confederate ones

Dec. 4, 2025

Military bases previously renamed to remove Confederate a...

By Eileen C. Moore

From Sacramento to Shiraz: Practical steps for registering California divorce judgments abroad

Nov. 25, 2025

A California divorce decree is binding throughout the U.S...

By Abbas Hadjian


Today's News

McCluskie and Campbell pleaded guilty to a $250,000 campaign funds wire fraud scheme and are cooperating with federal authorities. Their plea deals mentions ...


Criminal


Sacramento political figures pleaded guilty to conspiracy in campaign money siphoning case. Prosecutors have also accused a former chief of staff to Gov. Gav...


Civil Litigation


Los Angeles' chief negotiator, Matthew Szabo, testified the city met homelessness settlement reporting duties "to the extent possible," arguing data gaps ste...


A California appeals court sanctioned attorney Fahim Farivar for submitting an inaccurate brief with AI hallmarks, stressing attorneys' responsibility for ac...


Intellectual Property


A motion filed Thursday seeks $300 million in fees and nearly $2 million in expenses as Judge William Alsup of San Francisco prepares to step aside before fi...


9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals


A 9th Circuit panel upheld a restraining order barring OpenAI and IO Products from using the "IO" name, finding likely trademark infringement against startup...


Columns

Entertainment & Sports, Alternative Dispute Resolution

Negotiating Hollywood deals and mediating disputes rely on the same timeless principles: do your homework, build relationships...


The NIL era has created a complex marketplace where college athletes, franchises and lawyers must collaborate across sports, f...


Technology, Ethics/Professional Responsibility

Your new co-counsel? Like it or not, it's AI

Dec. 5, 2025
By Caroline A. Yuen, Regina Wang

Lawyers can't ignore generative AI, but they also can't abdicate their professional responsibilities to verify accuracy and pr...



Verdicts & Settlements

Bad Faith Cristin Morneau, individual... $153,000,000
Breach of Contract P&P Industries LLC and JT3 ... $29,306,734
Breach of Contract The Residences at Depot Str... $5,000,000
Wage and Hour Andrea Sosa, on behalf of h... $4,400,000
Auto v. Pedestrian Neeko Dedrick Alonzo Walker... $3,250,000
Wage and Hour Cecilia Perez, individually... $2,975,000
Wage and Hour Mary Magdalena Mejia, indiv... $1,950,000
Malpractice Doe Plaintiffs v. Roe Medic... $1,500,000
Malpractice Doe Plaintiffs v. Roe Medic... $1,500,000
Breach of Contract John Demas and Robert Burzi... $1,444,867

On the Move

Murphy, Pearson, Bradley & Feeney P.C.

Dec. 5, 2025


Thomas Tuon joined Murphy, Pearson, Bradley & Feeney P.C. as an associate in Murphy, Pearson, Bradley & Feeney (San Francisco). The move was Dec. 2, 2025.

Tuon focuses on intellectual property transactions, data privacy counseling, and professional liability and taxation litigation. Combining experience in both transactional and controversy matters, Tuon helps clients navigate licensing, compliance, and corporate structuring issues that arise at the intersection of innovation and regulation. He assists individuals, startups, and established companies in protecting their intangible assets, managing risk, and ensuring compliance with evolving state and federal frameworks.


Details

Murphy, Pearson, Bradley & Feeney P.C. has 69 attorneys in 4 offices including San Francisco, Sacramento, Los Angeles. Among the law firm’s key practice areas are Litigation, Professional Liability, White Collar Defense & Investigations, Intellectual Property, Sports & Entertainment . The firm’s website is www.mpbf.com

Address

550 California Street, 14th Floor , San Francisco CA 94104 United States
T: (415) 788-1900

Featured Content


Community News

Community News, Alternative Dispute Resolution


The bar association dates to 1955, when Black attorneys in the Bay Area banded together to confront discrimination in the cour...



Podcasts

In the fourth episode of In the Counsel's Chair, Hanson Bridgett Managing Partner Kristina Lawson discusses her time as an ele...



Daily Appellate Report

Torts, Real Property

Andrews v. Wagner

Landowner bore no liability for insurance inspector's injuries occurring on her backyard steps when, despite being qualified as a "hirer" under *Privette*, the steps were not a concealed ...


Education

Jacobson v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.

The Education Code does not require vendors to disclose fees for retirement investment products that, while previously offered to public education employees, are no longer available to pr...


Torts, Attorneys

Landis' Labyrinth v. Whitaker

Where judge's factual findings in previous case met issue preclusion requirements and created triable issues regarding probable cause and malice in subsequent malicious prosecution case, ...


Torts

Rancho Cucamonga Central School Dist. v. Superior Court (Flowers)

School district's lack of actual or constructive knowledge of child abuse in YMCA after-school program was fatal to plaintiff's negligent supervision claim.


Criminal Law and Procedure

Lee v. Superior Court (People)

Dismissal was required where preliminary hearing on amended complaint was set outside the statutory 60-day period and defendant's limited time waiver--despite defendant's general time wai...