This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...



Special Reports


ADR Profile

The Activist

Kendall J. Newman
Judicate West

Firm Profile

Brothers in Law

Mendez & Sanchez

2025-12-11

MCLE

SEC at the door? Mind your ethics - and your client

Dec. 10, 2025

When the SEC comes knocking, corporate counsel must call ...

By Alanna G. Clair, Shari L. Klevens

Military bases' new names sound like the old Confederate ones

Dec. 4, 2025

Military bases previously renamed to remove Confederate a...

By Eileen C. Moore

From Sacramento to Shiraz: Practical steps for registering California divorce judgments abroad

Nov. 25, 2025

A California divorce decree is binding throughout the U.S...

By Abbas Hadjian


Today's News

Civil Litigation


Compton City Attorney Eric J. Perrodin resigned amid dueling lawsuits with the city over his office's authority, staffing, and alleged misconduct, ending a p...


9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals


A divided 9th Circuit panel upheld the dismissal of a lawsuit claiming Campbell's 'Air Fried' chips mislead consumers, though a dissent argued reasonable sho...


A San Francisco judge denied Nima Momeni's request to stay a wrongful death suit during pending matters around his conviction for murder, finding no real sel...


9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals


While most new 9th Circuit judges remain quiet for months, Judge Eric C. Tung has already issued a dissent and statement in politically charged cases, aligni...


A Los Angeles judge advanced hearings for Palisades Fire victims seeking permission to file late government claims, rejecting state arguments that emergency ...


Immigration, Civil Litigation


Plaintiffs in the Flores case say ICE and CBP continue violating settlement mandates, subjecting children to prolonged, unsafe detention despite court orders...


Columns

Criminal

San Francisco's proposal to order private attorneys to represent indigent criminal defendants ignores a fundamental reality: c...


Construction

SB 440: How California's Fair Payment Act will reshape construction disputes in 2026

Dec. 11, 2025
By Brenda K. Radmacher, Jay R. Houghton

California's Senate Bill 440 takes effect Jan. 1, imposing new non-waivable dispute resolution rules on private construction c...


Construction, Civil Procedure

Oswald v. Landmark Builders proves the 5-year rule waits for no one -- not even a pandemic.



Verdicts & Settlements

Wage and Hour Angelica Velasquez, individ... $850,000
Auto v. Auto Austin Richard Moreno v. Jo... $675,000
Wage and Hour Deanna Rickets, an individu... $600,000
Wage and Hour Steven Milligan, individual... $480,000
Unfair Competition The People of the State of ... $350,000
Wage and Hour Michelle Mireles, individua... $250,000
Wage and Hour Lakeshia Cook-Farrar, as an... $230,000
Wage and Hour Lee Solomon, individually a... $225,000
Wage and Hour Santino Lopez, on behalf of... $163,537
Song-Beverly Act John McCormack v. FCA US LL... $89,518

On the Move

Murphy, Pearson, Bradley & Feeney P.C.

Dec. 5, 2025


Thomas Tuon joined Murphy, Pearson, Bradley & Feeney P.C. as an associate in Murphy, Pearson, Bradley & Feeney (San Francisco). The move was Dec. 2, 2025.

Tuon focuses on intellectual property transactions, data privacy counseling, and professional liability and taxation litigation. Combining experience in both transactional and controversy matters, Tuon helps clients navigate licensing, compliance, and corporate structuring issues that arise at the intersection of innovation and regulation. He assists individuals, startups, and established companies in protecting their intangible assets, managing risk, and ensuring compliance with evolving state and federal frameworks.


Details

Murphy, Pearson, Bradley & Feeney P.C. has 69 attorneys in 4 offices including San Francisco, Sacramento, Los Angeles. Among the law firm’s key practice areas are Litigation, Professional Liability, White Collar Defense & Investigations, Intellectual Property, Sports & Entertainment . The firm’s website is www.mpbf.com

Address

550 California Street, 14th Floor , San Francisco CA 94104 United States
T: (415) 788-1900

Featured Content


Community News

Community News, Alternative Dispute Resolution


The bar association dates to 1955, when Black attorneys in the Bay Area banded together to confront discrimination in the cour...



Podcasts

Davis Wright Tremaine's Vid Prabhakaran joins In the Counsel's Chair to break down three of the biggest challenges facing the ...


Daily Appellate Report

Criminal Law and Procedure

People v. Kinnear

Trial court erred by imposing upper term and second-strike sentence after accepting defendant's stipulation without advising him of his constitutional rights or eliciting a knowing and vo...


Prisoners' Rights

Human Rights Defense Center, Inc. v. Uttecht

Prison officials were required to show that policy restricting mail to prisoners--impinging their First Amendment rights--advanced penological interest of reducing inmate-on-inmate violence.


Antitrust

Epic Games Inc. v. Apple Inc.

District court did not abuse its discretion by finding Apple in contempt after it willfully violated an injunction prohibiting anticompetitive behavior that discouraged purchases from App...


Criminal Law and Procedure

People v. Harrison

Defendant's resentencing petition for mitigation due to military service-related conditions failed because his conviction was for a statutorily excluded super-strike offense rendering him...


Torts, Immunity

Modification: Gilliland v. City of Pleasanton

Trial court applied an incorrect legal standard in finding that vehicle collision occurred during a qualifying police "pursuit," which would immunize the city from liability.