This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Alternative Dispute Resolution

Sep. 17, 1998

Arbitrators Won't Decide Federal Employment Suits

Bowing to a 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decision as well as pressure from the plaintiffs' bar, the nation's largest for-profit alternative dispute resolution provider no longer arbitrates Title VII employment claims arising in the nation's largest circuit. Still unclear, however, is whether Irvine-based JAMS/Endispute will also refrain from hearing related state claims.

By Tom Orewyler
Daily Journal Staff Writer
        Bowing to a 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decision as well as pressure from the plaintiffs' bar, the nation's largest for-profit alternative dispute resolution provider no longer arbitrates Title VII employment claims arising in the nation's largest circuit. Still unclear, however, is whether Irvi...

To continue reading, please subscribe.

Already a subscriber?

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)