This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

California Supreme Court

Aug. 13, 2016

High court: arbitrator decides if class arbitration is available

There is a vibrant debate among federal and state courts as to whether classwide arbitration is authorized when an arbitration agreement is silent or ambiguous on the topic. By Zuzana S. Ikels and John Sheehan

Zuzana S. Ikels

Phone: (415) 554-3900

Email: Zuzana.Ikels@sfcityatty.org

See more...

By Zuzana S. Ikels and John Sheehan

There is a vibrant debate among federal and state courts as to whether classwide arbitration is authorized when an arbitration agreement is silent or ambiguous on the topic. The wide-ranging caselaw is usually explained by the distinctions between the particular arbitration agreement at issue. But the disparity in outcomes also reflects the competing policy concerns of the judiciary related to class action, du...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up