Corporate
Aug. 6, 2016
Defining the market to avoid dismissal in antitrust actions
A recent, unpublished 9th Circuit opinion demonstrates the minimalist geographic market allegations antitrust plaintiffs can make to avoid dismissal. By Gregory L. Curtner, John S. Worden and Steven J. Cernak of Schiff Hardin
On July 15, a 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel overturned the dismissal of plaintiffs' tying and steering antitrust claims in the putative class action of Sidibe v. Sutter Health, 14-16234. While the panel designated it as not for ...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In