By Eric B. Evans
In December 2015, several amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure took effect. Among the changes, the proportionality considerations previously appearing in Rule 26(b)(2)(C)(iii) - requiring courts to limit discovery where the burden or expense outweighed the likely benefit - were moved to Rule 26(b)(1), which defines the general scope of discovery. As the Advisory Committee explained, the revision was necessary, in par...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In