This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Jul. 28, 2016

Courts beginning to consider new proportionality rules

In December 2015, several amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure took effect. Among the changes, the proportionality considerations previously appearing in Rule 26(b)(2)(C)(iii). By Eric B. Evans

Eric B. Evans

See more...

By Eric B. Evans

In December 2015, several amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure took effect. Among the changes, the proportionality considerations previously appearing in Rule 26(b)(2)(C)(iii) - requiring courts to limit discovery where the burden or expense outweighed the likely benefit - were moved to Rule 26(b)(1), which defines the general scope of discovery. As the Advisory Committee explained, the revision was necessary, in par...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up