Real Estate/Development,
Government,
Administrative/Regulatory
Jan. 24, 2012
The state of eminent domain for the new year
2011 ended with a bang - how might these major decisions impact 2012?
Bradford B. Kuhn
Partner, Nossaman LLP
Phone: (949) 833-7800
Email: bkuhn@nossaman.com
Chair of Nossaman's Eminent Domain and Valuation Practice Group, Bradford advises clients on all real property aspects of infrastructure and development projects. Mr. Kuhn represents public and private sector clients with real estate and business litigation matters, including eminent domain, inverse condemnation, land use/zoning, landlord/tenant, and construction disputes.
Rick E. Rayl
Member, Nossaman LLP
Email: rrayl@nossaman.com
Rick is chair of Nossaman's Eminent Domain and Valuation Practice Group and a member of the firm's Real Estate Practice Group. He is an experienced trial attorney dealing with eminent domain, inverse condemnation, and other real estate and business disputes.
Looking back over the past few years, we've seen a significant uptick in right of way projects and important case decisions. Following a relatively quiet 2009, we saw increased activity in 2010, with regulatory takings issues garnering significant attention. As we rolled into 2011, the momentum continued, with the status of redevelopment agencies across California dominating the headlines.
As we look to 2012, we expect another exciting year. What follows is an eminent domain reca...For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In