Environmental & Energy
Jul. 25, 2008
Keeping Up Appearances
The State Water Board’s position to allow its attorneys to perform overlapping functions is out of step with the developing standards of due process and at odds with its own practices, write Jeffrey Dintzer and Tony Brown. - Forum Column
Jeffrey Dintzer
Partner, Alston & Bird LLP
333 S Hope St Ste 1600
Los Angeles , CA 90071
Phone: (213) 576-1063
Email: jeffrey.dintzer@alston.com
Boston University SOL; Boston MA
During over 30 years representing clients in complex environmental, toxic tort, and land use litigation, class actions, and administrative proceedings, he has been involved in precedent-setting cases affecting the way industries such as oil & gas do business in California.
By Jeffrey Dintzer and Tony Brown
This article appears on Page 6
The California Supreme Court will soon be deciding in Morongo Band of Mission Indians v. State Water Resources Control Board, S155589, whether due process requires unitary administrative agencies - those that function as both accuser and adjudicator on matters within their jurisdiction - to ensure that their staff attorneys serve only ...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In