This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Letters,
Appellate Practice

Sep. 23, 2014

Tentative opinions in the next decade or two

"Far-fetched" is not the same as "unlikely to be implemented."

Paul S. Berger

Research Attorney
3rd District Court of Appeal

See more...

The subheading of the recent article in which I was quoted, "Appellate lawyers renew call for tentative rulings," Sept. 19, stated that getting justices to issue draft opinions was a "far-fetched proposal." But "far-fetched" is not the same as "unlikely to be implemented." While the tentative opinion proposal may fall into the latter category, it certainly does not fall into the former.

Then again, the Wright brothers' idea of a flying machine was certainly considered "far-fetched" ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up