Perspective
Jun. 14, 2012
Legal challenges to California’s Proposition 13 are likely to fail
The state Supreme Court has only twice found an initiative invalid on the grounds that it was actually a revision. By Jennifer M. Fry of Pacific Legal Foundation
On June 26, a panel of the 2nd District Court of Appeal will hear oral arguments in a lawsuit challenging a key provision of Proposition 13.
The challenge is doomed to fail.
Originally called Young v. Schmidt, but now Young v. Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, this case attacks Proposition 13's requirement that state tax increases must pass by a two-thirds vote of both chambers of the Legislature. Char...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In