This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Criminal

May 18, 2012

What is the best medicine in Lafler?

The Court settled whether a defendant could claim ineffective assistance of counsel for rejected pleas; the proper remedy, however, remains a mystery.

2nd Appellate District, Division 2

Brian M. Hoffstadt

Associate Justice, California Court of Appeal

UCLA School of Law, 1995

In Lafler v. Cooper, 132 S. Ct. 1376 (2012), the U.S. Supreme Court held that a criminal defendant could state a claim that his counsel provided ineffective assistance of counsel when the defendant rejected a pre-trial plea offer and proceeded to trial. Although precedent-setting for the U.S. Supreme Court, both the state Supreme Court and the 9th Circuit have recognized such claims for decades. See In re Alvernaz, 2 Cal.4th 924 (1992); United States v. Blaylock, 20 ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Sign up for Daily Journal emails