This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

U.S. Supreme Court,
Constitutional Law

Oct. 15, 2009

The Cross on the Hill

Erwin Chemerinsky of UC Irvine, School of Law dissects Salazar v. Buono, an Establishment Clause case set for review by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Erwin Chemerinsky

Dean and Jesse H. Choper Distinguished Professor of Law, UC Berkeley School of Law

Erwin's most recent book is "Worse Than Nothing: The Dangerous Fallacy of Originalism." He is also the author of "Closing the Courthouse," (Yale University Press 2017).

CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS

By Erwin Chemerinsky

Few cases before the Supreme Court this year will receive more media attention than Salazar v. Buono, 527 F.3d 758 (9th Cir. 2008), cert. granted, 129 S.Ct. 1313 (2009). The issue is whether a large cross in a large federal park in the Mojave Desert violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. The underlying issues are profoundly important: When do religious symbols on government property vi...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Sign up for Daily Journal emails