Insurance
Mar. 23, 2010
New Standards for Punitive Damages?
Judge Rex Heeseman asks whether concepts such as "arbitrary" will have force in the world of punitive damages.
Rex Heeseman
JAMS
555 W 5th St Fl 32
Los Angeles , CA 90013-1055
Phone: (213) 253-9772
Fax: (213) 620-0100
Email: rheeseman@jamsdar.com
Stanford Univ Law School
Rex Heeseman retired from the Los Angeles Count Superior Court bench in 2014. He is at JAMS, Los Angeles. Besides speaking at various MCLE programs, he co-authors The Rutter Group's practice guide on "Insurance Litigation." From 2002 to 2015, he was an adjunct professor at Loyola Law School.
Regarding a well-known oil spill, Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker, 128 S.Ct. 2605 (2008) observed that "we take for granted the District Court's calculation of the total relevant compensatory damage at $507.5 million. A punitive-to-compensatory ratio of 1:1 thus yields [the] maximum punitive damages."
The opinion by Justice David H. Souter, with four justices signing on, proclaimed: "The real problem, it seems, is the stark unpredictability of punitive awards." The opinion went ...For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In