This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You must have a membership to view this page.

Constitutional Law

Jul. 4, 2001

Fair Way?

Recently, the worlds of professional sports and civil rights law collided in the case of PGA Tour v. Martin. Because the U.S. Supreme Court made the correct decision, both were left better off for the experience.

Michael Waterstone

Fritz B. Burns Dean
Loyola Law School, Los Angeles

Email: michael.waterstone@lls.edu

        By Michael Waterstone
        
        Recently, the worlds of professional sports and civil rights law collided in the case of PGA Tour v. Martin. Because the U.S. Supreme Court made the correct decision, both were left better off for the experience. This case is important because it takes the first step in explaining how the...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up