Letter to the Editor
Mar. 17, 2015
LETTER: Mandatory minimums column lacks specifics
A recent column asserts that "tough on crime" safety measures are "little more than poorly thought through efforts to pad the pockets of special interests," yet the article never explains this. By June S. Ailin
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR COLUMN
While I am not a fan of mandatory minimum sentences, I do think the Daily Journal should make sure opinion pieces such as this one deliver on what they promise. The Michael and Ian Pancer assert that "tough on crime" safety measures are "little more than poorly thought through efforts to pad the pockets of special interests," yet the article never identifies those special interests or explains how these sentencing requiremen...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In