Labor/Employment
Oct. 5, 2016
Employer liability ruling is not what plaintiff's bar says
The "required vehicle" exception to the "going and coming" rule has received a fair amount of ink recently, especially in light of Jorge v. Culinary Institute of America. By N. Asir Fiola
The "required vehicle" exception to the "going and coming" rule has received a fair amount of ink recently, especially in light of Jorge v. Culinary Institute of America, 2016 DJDAR 9646 (Sept. 16, 2016). The required vehicle exception applies when "an employer requires an employee to drive to and from the workplace so that the vehicle is available for the employer's business." The employee's commute "may also be within t...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In