Judges and Judiciary
Jul. 6, 2005
Defender Finds 'Warrick' Dissent Troubling
Letter to the Editor - I just finished reading Warrick v. Superior Court , 2005 DJDAR 6347, as well as the Daily Journal article in which the case was discussed ("Court's Ruling May Increase In Camera Pitches Reviews," June 10 Daily Journal). In my opinion, the majority not only follows clearly established precedent but also recognizes the practical issues involved in preparing and filing a Pitchess motion.
I just finished reading Warrick v. Superior Court, 2005 DJDAR 6347, as well as the Daily Journal article in which the case was discussed ("Court's Ruling May Increase In Camera Pitches Reviews," June 10 Daily Journal). In my opinion, the majority not only follows clearly established precede...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In