Law Practice,
Insurance
Apr. 12, 2007
Too Punitive?
By Rex Heeseman - A Los Angeles trial judge tries to make sense of appellate courts' review of the use of multipliers in punitive-damages awards.
Rex Heeseman
JAMS
555 W 5th St Fl 32
Los Angeles , CA 90013-1055
Phone: (213) 253-9772
Fax: (213) 620-0100
Email: rheeseman@jamsdar.com
Stanford Univ Law School
Rex Heeseman retired from the Los Angeles Count Superior Court bench in 2014. He is at JAMS, Los Angeles. Besides speaking at various MCLE programs, he co-authors The Rutter Group's practice guide on "Insurance Litigation." From 2002 to 2015, he was an adjunct professor at Loyola Law School.
By Rex Heeseman
The blockbuster decision of State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Campbell, 538 U.S. 408 (2003), contained several significant comments, including "an award of [punitive damages] more than four times the amount of compensatory damages might be close to the line of constitutional impropriety."
Appellate courts thereafter addre...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In