Labor/Employment
Aug. 11, 2012
Outdated handbook terms can foreclose arbitration
In the wake of Concepcion, there is an increasing need to review old agreements and policies contained in employee handbooks.
Ronald W. Novotny
Of Counsel, Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo
Phone: (562) 653-3846
Email: rnovotny@aalrr.com
Ronald represents management in labor and employment matters and writes frequently on employment law matters. He is also an Arbitrator on the American Arbitration Association’s Employment Law Panel.
Jonathan Judge
Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & RomoAs employers increasingly consider adopting mandatory arbitration agreements for employment disputes following last year's Supreme Court decision upholding class arbitration waivers in AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, there is an increasing need to review old agreements and policies contained in employee handbooks to ensure that they do not render such attempts futile. Nowhere was this demonstrated more clearly than in the recent case of Sparks v. Vista Del Mar Child and Fa...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In