California Courts of Appeal
May 13, 2016
2nd District tentatively reverses decision to identify alleged defamer
The panel found that the use of the word "whistle-blow" did not sufficiently prove defamation.
Daily Journal Staff Writer
LOS ANGELES - A 2nd District Court of Appeal panel Wednesday tentatively reversed a judge's decision to identify a John Doe defendant in a lawsuit alleging defamation of a visual effects company.
The lawsuit was filed against two John Does who sent emails to potential or former business associates of two visual effects companies, Vitality Visual Effects and Avongard Pr...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In