Myron Moskovitz' article, "Oral argument: if not necessary, waive it goodbye" (April 18), was quite thought provoking. As a preliminary matter, many practitioners, including myself, are concerned that, if we waive oral argument, we might inadvertently (and incorrectly) communicate to the appellate court that the appeal is not all that important to our clients and/or the development of the law in our state. Perhaps, the courts can do more to allay this ...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In




