U.S. Supreme Court
Apr. 26, 2014
What's next, a bad driving exception to the Fourth Amendment?
"After today's opinion all of us on the road, and not just drug dealers, are at risk of having our freedom of movement curtailed." That pretty much sums up a recent decision. By Mason C. Clutter
"After today's opinion all of us on the road, and not just drug dealers, are at risk of having our freedom of movement curtailed on suspicion of drunkenness, based upon a phone tip, true or false, of a single instance of careless driving." This ominous prediction, expressed by Justices Antonin Scalia, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan in the dissenting opinion in Navarette v. California, 2014 DJDAR 4912...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In