By Robert Fried and Amber S. Healy
On Oct. 20, in Soto v. Motel 6 Operating L.P., the California Court of Appeal held that employers are not required to list the value of accrued vacation time on wage statements provided to employees.
Plaintiff Lidia Soto alleged that Motel 6, her former employer, violated California's itemized wage statement statute, Labor Code Section 226, by failing to include the monetary value of accrued va...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In



