Litigation
Nov. 2, 2016
Think twice before filing that Article III challenge
Following the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, 136 S. Ct. 1540 (2016), many companies facing consumer lawsuits are challenging the consumer's Article III standing to sue. By Jason Ibey
Jason A. Ibey
Kazerouni Law Group APCPhone: (800) 400-6808
Email: jason@kazlg.com
Whittier Coll SOL; CA
Following the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, 136 S. Ct. 1540 (2016), many companies facing consumer lawsuits, including putative class actions involving statutory damages claims, are challenging the consumer's Article III standing to sue. While some defendants have been successful in obtaining dismissals in federal court on these grounds, such a strategy may be shortsighted - winning a motion to ...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In