This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Civil Litigation,
Letters,
Intellectual Property

Sep. 6, 2012

Apple v. Samsung result a no brainer

A number of articles have been written attempting to explain why Apple won and Samsung lost the trial. It's so simple.

Stanley K. Jacobs

Senior Partner, Jacobs & Jacobs LLP

Email: sjacobs@jacobslawyers.com

A number of articles have been published by the Daily Journal attempting to explain why Apple won and Samsung lost the trial. I am reminded of the late, great trial lawyer, Harry Philo. Harry Philo was a pioneer plaintiff trial lawyer, based out of Detroit, specializing in product liability cases against automobile manufacturers. Harry's dream case in the 1960s was to represent his severely injured client in a product liability case against Volkswagen venued in Detroit. Apple v. Samsung...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Sign up for Daily Journal emails