By Laura Ernde
Daily Journal Staff Writer
This article appears on Page 3.
Parties whose only offense was being on the losing side of an important appellate ruling should not have to pay their opponent's legal fees, the California Supreme Court ruled Thursday.
The unanimous decision denied $100,000 to appellate specialist Charles A. Bird for his work on a landmark case that gave ...
Daily Journal Staff Writer
This article appears on Page 3.
Parties whose only offense was being on the losing side of an important appellate ruling should not have to pay their opponent's legal fees, the California Supreme Court ruled Thursday.
The unanimous decision denied $100,000 to appellate specialist Charles A. Bird for his work on a landmark case that gave ...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In




