This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Mar. 17, 2012

Pre-emptive strikes under the UN Charter?

A close reading of the U.N. Charter appears to be more liberal on the use of force than traditional international law. By Sarah P. Condor-Fisher of CondorLaw.


By Sarah P. Condor-Fisher


The term "treaty" is viewed more narrowly under the U.S. Constitution (Article II, Section 2, Clause 2) than in international law, which defines any kind of agreement on the congressional or executive level as a "treaty." Our law distinguishes treaties from executive agreements. Treaties require advice and consent by two-thirds of the Senate, and as we know, can provide the president with much more political clout tha...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up