By Alec H. Boyd
In Harris v. Rudin, Richman & Appel, 99 Daily Journal D.A.R. 8507 (2nd Dist. Aug. 18, 1999), the California Court of Appeal held that attorneys are immune from liability for intentional infliction of emotions distress based on conduct during malpractice settlement negotiations with their former clie...
In Harris v. Rudin, Richman & Appel, 99 Daily Journal D.A.R. 8507 (2nd Dist. Aug. 18, 1999), the California Court of Appeal held that attorneys are immune from liability for intentional infliction of emotions distress based on conduct during malpractice settlement negotiations with their former clie...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In