This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Personal Injury & Torts

Aug. 31, 1999

All Intents

^^Tort Law^^ All Intents Supreme Court Limits Expansion of Proposition 213 Part of this narrow construction may come from the court's apparent belief that Proposition 213 is overbroad.

        By Steven G. Mehta
        
        It has been several years since the enactment of the Personal Responsibility Act of 1996, commonly known as Proposition 213. During this time period, defendants in automobile-accident lawsuits have attempted to expand the scope of Proposition 213 well beyond the language of the statute. The California S...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up