Insurance
Aug. 20, 1999
Tilting the Balance
Tilting the Balance Policies That Attempt to Shift the Allocation Burden By Grace A. Carter and Eve M. Coddon Recently, a number of courts have struggled with the issue of how defense costs should be allocated between covered and noncovered claims under various types of liability-insurance policies. These thorny issues have led courts to formulate a number of different tests for allocation and have caused some insurers to draft policies that attempt to shift the allocation burdens or
By Grace A. Carter and Eve M. Coddon
Recently, a number of courts have struggled with the issue of how defense costs should be allocated between covered and noncovered claims under various types of liability-insurance policies. These thorny issues have led courts to formulate a number of different tests for allocation and...
Recently, a number of courts have struggled with the issue of how defense costs should be allocated between covered and noncovered claims under various types of liability-insurance policies. These thorny issues have led courts to formulate a number of different tests for allocation and...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In