This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Civil Litigation,
Labor/Employment,
California Supreme Court

Nov. 16, 2011

There's more at stake in Brinker: How the decision can impact class action litigation

The justices may use Brinker to articulate and underscore California procedure.

Curtis A. Graham

Littler Mendelson, P.C.

Phone: (213) 443-4215

Email: cagraham@littler.com

By February 2012, the state Supreme Court will publish its decision in Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court, 165 Cal. App. 4th 25 (2008). Brinker is the first of eight opinions before the Court in which a common-sense approach to an employee's entitlement to a meal period has generally prevailed. It is likely that the Court will blaze a new trail in accordance with its overriding concern with curbing litigation abuse, while preserving and promoting the class-wide adju...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Sign up for Daily Journal emails