This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

U.S. Supreme Court,
Constitutional Law

Jan. 12, 2017

When analogies fail

Nowhere is the challenge to integrate the advance of technology into the law more public than in the U.S. Supreme Court's efforts to apply the Fourth Amendment to new technologies.

2nd Appellate District, Division 5

Brian M. Hoffstadt

Presiding Justice
California Court of Appeal

UCLA School of Law, 1995

2017 is here. We are now part way between the idyllic 2015 depicted in "Back to the Future II" and the dystopian 2019 portended in "Blade Runner." Neither prognostication got it completely right, but both accurately predicted the continued advance of technology.

Integrating this seemingly unstoppable advance into the law that reflects and defines our society and its values is another thing entirely. Nowhere is the challenge more public than in the U.S. Supreme Court's efforts to appl...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up