This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Insurance

Jan. 10, 2017

When an insured's defense and prosecution costs overlap

Insurers owing a duty to defend must pay all applicable defense fees and costs — even ones that do "double duty" as prosecution costs.

Dominic Nesbitt

Partner
Osborne & Nesbitt LLP

Email: dnesbitt@onlawllp.com


INSURANCE INSIGHTS

It is a common refrain heard from liability insurers that the "duty to defend" in California does not encompass the prosecution of an insured's own affirmative claims. However, as with many issues having to do with insurance, the law is not that simple.

Although it is true that a defending insurer in California has no per se duty to prosecute claims on behalf of an insured, ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up