This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You must have a membership to view this page.

Perspective

Dec. 29, 2016

Charter school decision affects entire state

At issue was the legality of a "satellite facility" opened by a charter school outside of the geographic boundaries of its chartering district, but within the high school district, which are both located within the same county. By Scott Huber

Scott E. Huber

Partner
Cota Cole LLP

Email: shuber@cotalawfirm.com

Scott is a partner in the firm's Roseville office.

By Scott Huber

MUNICIPAL MATTERS

In the recent decision by the 3rd District Court of Appeal in Anderson Union High School District v. Shasta Secondary Home School, 2016 DJDAR 10279 (Oct. 17, 2016), the court reached a conclusion with wide-ranging and serious impacts for charter schools across California. As part of the California Legislature's 2002 amendments to the Charter School Act, "strin...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up