Litigation
Apr. 27, 2002
Wires Crossed
The defense attorney claimed that he won by using the plaintiff's own photographic evidence to undermine his credibility. But the plaintiff's counsel alleges that his Afghan client never had a chance because the trial took place soon after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.
But the plaintiff's counsel alleges that his Afghan client never had a chance because the trial took place soon after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.
FACTS
...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
