This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You have to be a subscriber to view this page.

California Supreme Court

Jan. 5, 2016

Is California's mutuality rule done for?

On Jan. 5, the California Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Baltazar v. Forever 21, the latest of several significant cases dealing with the enforceability of arbitration agreements at the U.S. and California Supreme Court. By Charles H. Jung and Pia Kim

Charles H. Jung

Partner
Nassiri & Jung LLP

Charles is President of the Bar Association of San Francisco

See more...

By Charles H. Jung and Pia Kim

On Jan. 5 at 9:00 a.m., the California Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Baltazar v. Forever 21, S204032, a case many believe the court may use to revisit the seminal Armendariz v. Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc., 24 Cal. 4th 83 (2000).

Baltazar is the latest of several significant cases dealing with the enforceability of arbitration agreements at the U.S. and Calif...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up