This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Focus (Forum & Focus)

May 2, 2008

Death Ruling Reveals Differing Views on the Role of Judges

Forum Column - By Hirbod Rashidi - The Supreme Court's recent death penalty ruling, with its multiple opinions, revealed how the justices see their roles as judges.

FORUM COLUMN

By Hirbod Rashidi
This article ppears on Page 6

      In the weeks leading to the Supreme Court's decision in Baze v. Rees, 553 U.S. __ (2008), the ABA Journal quoted attorney Thomas Goldstein, who said that the current round of litigation over the death penalty - dealing with the constitutionality of lethal injection as administered - "doesn't advance the goal of abolition one inch." I criticized this stateme...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up